On 23 December 1992 the National Security Court found the applicant guilty of disseminating separatist propaganda within the meaning of Law no. 3713.

been “proved guilty according to law”.

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law.” 3.

non-compliance with laws, orders or instructions, causes the death of another shall be liable to a term of imprisonment of between two and five years and to a fine of between 20,000 and 150,000 Turkish liras

Court notes that the offence in issue, namely the failure to comply with the authorised hours for the retail sale of alcohol, was a misdemeanour and punishable by a fine of not less than 30,454 Turkish liras

The applicant further stated that he had pleaded guilty because the police officers had beaten him. 18.

2024 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

VETIR, tels les extraits du catalogue 'ELLE' des 2 et 30 septembre 1991, présentant plusieurs mocassins à boucle ou avec un mors, montrent que l'on figure naturellement en ce cas aussi une chaussure 'GUCCI'et

    On 23 December 2002 the Kayseri Criminal Court found the applicant guilty of resisting police officers with a knife and breaking into his neighbours' flat.

the respondent Government and the observations in reply submitted by the applicant, Having deliberated, decides as follows:               THE FACTS The applicant, Lisa

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

2025 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Président : Monsieur Hervé BALLEREAU, Président de chambre, Assesseur : Madame Isabelle CHARPENTIER, Conseillère, Assesseur : Monsieur Bruno GUINET

They added that the Administrative Court was in any event bound by the finding of the criminal court regarding the first applicant’s guilt.

    Finally, although, in general, the expression “the state of evidence” may be a relevant factor for the existence and persistence of serious indications of guilt, in the present case it nevertheless

to the fact that the applicant had already been released while his application was still pending before it, the Constitutional Court awarded non-pecuniary compensation in the amount of 30,000 Turkish liras

On 10 December 2003 the court awarded 500,000,000 Turkish liras (TRL) –approximately 300 euros- each to Ali Kemal Mart, Göksel Avcı, Ertuğrul Saraçoğlu and TRL 250,000,000 to M.D. in respect of non-pecuniary

    Everyone charged with a criminal offence shall be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law. (...).” 79.

Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, § 79, ECHR 1999 ‑ II; and Guisset v. France , no. 33933/96, § 93, ECHR 2000 ‑ IX). Therefore, the Court makes no award under that head either. C.

La différence entre les carreaux R9 et R10 est perceptible visuellement (le R9 est plus brillant que le R10) et au toucher (le R9 est plus lisse que le R10).