Spain - 61800/08 Judgment 19.2.2013 [Section III] Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Admission in evidence of statement by sole prosecution witness who could not be cross-examined because

    The applicants alleged that their conviction had been solely or mainly based on a statement of R.K, despite the fact that they had been unable to question him at any stage of the proceedings

    The admission of the witness statements 51.     The position in respect of the admission of the witness statements requires closer attention.

    The applicant submitted that during the first week of her stay in Sveti Ivan Rilski State Psychiatric Hospital she had been assaulted by another patient.

    The applicant, Mr Stan Dragomir, is a Romanian national, who was born in 1957 and lives in Slobozia Conachi. 2.

  In December 2000 the Head of the State Security Bureau lifted the confidentiality restrictions from Mr   Matyjek’s case-file.

E B, scolarisé au cours de l'année 2022-2023 en classe de seconde générale et technologique, a formé de vœu d'une orientation en classe de 1ère STMG.

    The applicants alleged, in particular, that the admission of pre-trial witness statements in evidence against them had been in breach of their right to a fair hearing. 4.

In addition, they compiled a complex chemotherapy regimen in the event that his illness reached an acute stage. 20.

There are, however, other legitimate reasons why a witness may not attend trial; (iii)     when a witness has not been examined at any prior stage of the proceedings, allowing the admission of

He argued that she had not answered the question whether ZPH had adequate staff and could otherwise properly treat his medical condition.

    In addition, it had been unlawful to admit the evidence of Officers Ra. and Rü. in so far as they had reported the statements R.K. had made towards them at the scene of the events.

to remain silent in accordance with Article 210 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure), or at any other stage of the proceedings, the statements were nonetheless admitted in evidence and formed the

In particular, section III of the Regulation sets out the initial steps to be taken by the medical staff of a detention facility upon the admission of a detainee.

statement in lieu of live evidence at trial must be a measure of last resort; (iv) the admission as evidence of the statements of absent witnesses results in a potential disadvantage for the defendant,

On 24 September 2018 the applicant requested again a stay on execution of the removal order.

In addition, the police officers and the investigating judge who had examined O. and P. at the pre-trial stage had all testified at trial that they had found the witnesses to be credible. 28.

The appellate court also subscribed to the statement of I.L., according to which the applicant had sustained his injuries when, as a result of resisting the prison officers, he had fallen on the stairs

The anonymous statements testified that the second applicant had also been an organiser of the riot.

    The Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State ( Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak van de Raad van State , “the Division”) quashed the Regional Court’s decision on 15 January