The police officers formed a circle around the applicants so that they were not visible for the public and the public was not able to join them.

They argued furthermore that they had had no choice as to whether they could rely on section 9(1) or section 9(2), as this did not depend on their will, but on whether the authorities had taken possession

          The applicants complained about this to their lawyer at the outset of the proceedings.

   The applicants Muharrem Özcan, Polat Can and Yüksel Polat complain that they   did not have a fair trial as the courts based their reasoning on statements which they had made to the police

The first applicant followed the servicemen until they crossed the bridge over the Martanka River, turned left and then right. They took Kuybysheva Street in the direction of Trudovaya Street. 15.

that they considered contrary to the Convention and where a question arose as to their continued victim status.

They state that the third applicant could have got a job there.

They stated that their expulsion would have an adverse effect on their family life as they had been residing with their sons, were fully dependent on them, taking care of their grandchildren, Mr Sargis

They are merely there as a matter of convenience on the same sheet, but you may feel that in this instance they stand or fall together”. and he then dealt with the earlier conviction of the applicant’s

As far as the applicants offered a statutory declaration by the historian Niebel as proof of this allegation, the court held that in view of this finding there was no need to pursue the proof provided

Although they were aimed into the air and not at anyone, some of them hit the Ömer Reis-2 ’s port side and the cabin at the helm. They did not injure anybody on board. 11.

giving details of their practices, the members of the Bar who work there and the types of case handled.

being considered by them,      about the discharge by the authority of any of their      functions under this Part in relation to the child.

their arguments nor their new request for referral to the CJEU.

Though men crowded toward us, they parted their human sea so we could see the jammed crowd all the way to the wall.

They also complained, under Articles 10 and 14, about the employment restrictions imposed on them and their dismissals.

They did not waive the exercise of their right to civil action in the context of the same criminal proceedings.

Then they had seen a man running in their direction, who in the moonlight they had recognised as the applicant. Officer Kh. had shouted: “Police, stop – [I’m] going to fire!”

He stated that in their claim they had requested the punishment of the police officers who had used violence against them, as well as the punishment of the judges of the first-instance court who had dismissed