They argue that they have no responsibility for the initiation of the proceedings, as the courts ruled in their favour and decided to increase the amounts initially proposed by the expropriating public

On 20 February 1998 the Ministry of Finance established a 99 years’ usufruct right in favour of the applicant over both the historical church, namely Sacre Coeur, and the Treasury’s land on which the Sacre

2017, la Haute Cour de cassation et de justice («   la Haute Cour   ») condamna les requérantes à une peine de quatre ans et quatre mois de prison ferme des chefs d’abus de fonction et de favorisation

    On 14 November 2000, the Ialoveni District Court found in favour of the applicant and ordered the local council to pay him 52,797.00 Moldovan Lei (MDL) (approximately 5,000 euros (EUR)).

    On 7 March 2007 the Court decided to communicate the complaint concerning the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment in the applicant's favour to the Government.

However, no steps had been taken to enforce the Commission’s decisions in the applicants’ favour.

       Under Article 10 of the Convention, the applicant considers that the refusal to make a costs order in his favour can only, in the circumstances of this case, be seen as

    The applicant complained, under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, about continued non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour. 4.

    In June 2000 the applicant instituted proceedings in the Novogrodivka Town Court against the Bailiffs' Service for failure to execute the court decision in his favour.

    On 6   February   2003 and 23   February   2004 the applicant was informed by two letters from the Bailiffs' Service that the judgment in his favour was not enforced due

    On 16 April 1997 the Court of Cassation found in favour of NAT.

February 2001 the Butyrskiy District Court of Moscow granted the applicant’s complaint against the actions of the Social Security Centre of the Military Commissariat of Moscow and recovered in his favour

    The judgment in the applicant's favour 6.

    On 7 October 2014 the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina ruled in favour of the applicant that the enforcement proceedings before the Banja Luka Court of First Instance had not

    On 9 December 2004 the Leskovac Municipal Court ruled in favour of the applicant and ordered his employer to: i. reinstate him within 8 days to a post which corresponded to his professional

Subsequent events On 12 September 2016 the IPT notified the representatives of Mr   Guarnieri that it had carefully considered his domestic law complaints and made no determination in his favour.

    The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour.

DBVM-V-B7E-KT26 N° Minute : C1 Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à la SELARL BSV la SELARL ROBICHON & ASSOCIES SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

    The applicants complained of the non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour and of the lack of any effective remedy in domestic law.