Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1553320-1625764
11 janvier 2006
11 janvier 2006
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1900168-1995638
25 janvier 2007
25 janvier 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1648645-1729737
18 avril 2006
18 avril 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1186224-1231850
10 novembre 2004
10 novembre 2004
The Court accordingly held by four votes to three that there had been a violation of Article 7 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1489404-1561345
25 octobre 2005
25 octobre 2005
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 14 in conjunction with Article 8 in both cases.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003674597
23 février 1999
23 février 1999
The District Court held an oral hearing on 10 December 1996. The applicant, A.V. and their respective lawyers were present at the hearing.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3735586-4262137
7 novembre 2011
7 novembre 2011
24833/94), the European Court of Human Rights held by 15 votes to two that there had been a violation of Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 (right to participate in elections to choose the legislature)
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196338
2 septembre 2019
2 septembre 2019
The Service held that the applicant’s psychological problems had not been substantiated by any medical certificates.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1719109-1802483
27 juin 2006
27 juin 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (prohibition of inhuman treatment) on account of the fact that the applicants had
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1744305-1829095
10 août 2006
10 août 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1855778-1948265
7 décembre 2006
7 décembre 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the refusal to register the
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-704419-713434
25 février 2003
25 février 2003
Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 in both those respects.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1734977-1819108
13 juillet 2006
13 juillet 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to respect for family life), since the Romanian authorities had not made
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1881275-1980016
21 décembre 2006
21 décembre 2006
The Court held unanimously there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of ill-treatment of
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68272-68740
6 juin 2000
6 juin 2000
UNITED KINGDOM In a judgment [1] 1 notified in writing on 6 June 2000 in the case of Magee v. the United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1601997-1677316
8 mars 2006
8 mars 2006
The Court held by 11 votes to six that it was unable to take cognisance of the merits of the application as it fell outside the Court’s temporal jurisdiction.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2121609-2259584
21 septembre 2007
21 septembre 2007
Dans l’affaire Sogia Hellas , la requérante se plaint aussi, sous l’angle de l’article 13, de n’avoir disposé d’aucun recours effectif quant à son grief relatif à la durée de la procédure.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3193526-3555076
6 juillet 2010
6 juillet 2010
At the time of the events they held firearms licenses which were revoked by the Lithuanian authorities, in May 2002 and April 2003 respectively.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1597189-1672212
21 février 2006
21 février 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 11 (freedom of assembly and association) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the dissolution of the trade union
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2072328-2194255
17 juillet 2007
17 juillet 2007
The Court held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 6 (right to a fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights; and, by six votes to one, that there had been
Source officiellePage 96 sur 2440