CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 001 résultats pour « Quiene »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0429JUD000234602

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2002

29 avril 2002

In giving the leading judgment in The Queen on the Application of Mrs Dianne Pretty (Appellant) v.

Page 98 sur 101

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC007380201

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2003

13 novembre 2003

The burden of proving the existence of effective and sufficient remedies lies upon the State invoking the exception ( Quinn v. Ireland , no. 36887/97, Commission decision of 21 September 1999).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006DEC001360002

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2005

6 octobre 2005

By letter of 12 January 2000, in reply to a letter which the applicant’s sister had addressed to Queen of the Netherlands and which had been transmitted for a reply to the Ministry of Justice, the latter

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0114DEC003028096

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 1998

14 janvier 1998

assault        The applicant was held in the following military establishments: from 21 to 28 April 1995 at the guardroom at Wellington Barracks; from 28 April to 4 May 1995 at Queen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1981:1022JUD000752576

Admin. suprême

22 octobre 1981

22 octobre 1981

The function of the Queen in Council in making an Order once it has been approved by Parliament is purely formal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:1029JUD001423488

Admin. suprême

29 octobre 1992

29 octobre 1992

stated that the courts are the custodians of the fundamental rights set out in the Constitution and that their powers in this regard are as ample as the defence of the Constitution requires (The State (Quinn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1128DEC002341394

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1995

28 novembre 1995

The Royal Commission into British Nuclear Testing in Australia         The Australian Royal Commission was appointed in July 1984 by the Queen to enquire into the conduct

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD003940104

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

In our picture, the catwalk queen emerges from a gruelling two-hour session at Narcotics Anonymous and gives a friend a loving hug.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC002266910

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

    The applicant had therefore been left with no other option but to address letters to various instances, including “the King, [the] Queen and the Prime Minister, with the expectation” of obtaining

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0716JUD004309809

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 2013

16 juillet 2013

the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Irish nationals, Mrs Brigid McCaughey, Mr Pat Grew and Ms Letitia Quinn

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0702DEC003200118

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2019

2 juillet 2019

The claimant appealed the decision before the Court of Appeal (see The Queen on the application of Long v. Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWCA Civ 770).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2017

6 novembre 2017

    The Council of State scrutinised the Inner City Problems (Special Measures) Bill and submitted an advisory opinion to the Queen.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0907JUD003894810

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2021

7 septembre 2021

The Queen Mother, Giovanna, passed away in 2000. The first applicant’s return to Bulgaria 11 .     The first applicant visited Bulgaria in 1996 and on several occasions thereafter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0218JUD002597807

Admin. suprême

18 février 2010

18 février 2010

  Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 170, ECHR 2000-IV, and Quinn v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0223DEC003398596

Admin. suprême

23 février 1999

23 février 1999

The applicant was informed that an allegation had been made regarding his sexual orientation (the terms “queen” and “out and out bender” were used) and it was made clear that the investigators had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628JUD004151610

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2016

28 juin 2016

; On 17 September 1998, while serving their sentence at HMP   Peterhead, the applicants were detained by the police under section 14 of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 and removed to Queen

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1128DEC002182593

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1995

28 novembre 1995

The Royal Commission into British Nuclear Testing in Australia        The Australian Royal Commission was appointed in July 1984 by the Queen to enquire into the conduct of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2010

16 décembre 2010

    The courts are the custodians of the rights set out in the Constitution and their powers are as ample as the defence of the Constitution requires ( The State (Quinn) v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1978:0118JUD000531071

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 1978

18 janvier 1978

The Belfast Parliament was prorogued and the Queen empowered to legislate in its stead by Order in Council.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0226JUD004244302

Admin. suprême

26 février 2009

26 février 2009

However, the national authorities must attempt to keep it to a minimum ( see Quinn v.   France , judgment of 22   March 1995, Series A no.   311, p. 17, §   42; Giulia Manzoni v.

Source officielle