were in themselves punishable by law.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1957 and lives in Shumen. At the relevant time he was an officer in the Bulgarian Army. 6 .

    Par faits nouveaux il faut entendre   : (...) 2)     une violation d'une disposition de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1971 and lived prior to his arrest in Baku. A.

The applicant therefore considered that his participation in the cocaine trafficking was not punishable.   The court considered this allegation to be incredible and unproven.

Par conséquent, la Cour conclut à l’unanimité à la violation de l’article 3, faute pour les instances turques d’avoir fait preuve de la diligence et de la volonté que la gravité des circonstances imposait

It can be released to those entitled earlier if that does not hinder the establishment of the facts.

. ; "aux motifs que les faits ci-dessus exposés sont susceptibles de recevoir en droit algérien les qualifications d'escroqueries, de faux en écriture de banque, de complicité de détournement et de

       The facts as submitted by the applicant may be summarised as follows.   A.

THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

THE FACTS 2.     The applicants’ details are indicated in the appended table. 3.     The facts of the cases may be summarised as follows.

General Principles “ ... Legality 30.     Any restrictions imposed must have a formal basis in primary law.

As to the private expert opinion, he considered that the fact that the court-appointed expert had been made aware of the private expert’s comments did not suffice for the respect of the principles of a

(b)     The Court's assessment (i)     General principles The presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of the Article 6 is one of the elements of the fair criminal trial that

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

    The Court’s assessment (a)     General principles 52.

He complained that the proceedings violated his right to a fair trial, because the Kleve Regional Court had failed sufficiently to examine the facts.

In assessing this question the Court of Appeal takes into account the fact that in the District Court G. was not proposed as a witness and the fact that the parties have been provided with an opportunity

He relied on Article 7 of the Convention, submitting that the system of penalties for speeding offences violated the criminal-law principle of no punishment without law.

Cette jurisprudence repose sur le principe, établi par le Tribunal fédéral notamment dans deux arrêts de principe (ATF   80   IV   147 de 1954 et   ATF 113   IV   17 de 1987