Civile Cab. 5 N° RG 26/02242 - N° Portalis DB2E-W-B7K-ODAW Copie executoire à : Me Isabelle HUET-DURANTON Me Sophie JAEGER Copie : dossier Le Le Greffier PARTIE DEMANDERESSE Monsieur

représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 41] [Localité 37] N° SIRET : 480 34 4 8 94 N'ayant pas constitué avocat Société ALTERNATIVE DEBT FUND FCP-RAIF SHORT DURATION

    Taking into account all the circumstances of the specific case and, in particular, the duration of the seizure, the need to maintain it in view of the progress of the criminal proceedings

.s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .s60570E66 { width:233.81pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 42323/98 by Hendrik Mathijs

Because the duration of the disenfranchisement is directly related to the duration of incarceration, a serious criminal offender may never actually be denied the opportunity to vote if there is no election

Mathieu-Mohin and Mr.

with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17   February 2017 by Ms Anna Maria Cecilia Martucci and Ms Matilde

    Mathieu v. France (application no. 68673/01)   Violation of Article 5 § 4 The applicant, Ghislaine Mathieu, is a 56-year-old French national who lives in Roynac (France).

(e) persons under a temporary ban from public office, for the duration of that ban. 2. Judgments in criminal cases shall entail the loss of voting rights only once they have become final.”

    When imposing a preventive measure, the court must fix its duration and specify the conditions with which the person concerned must comply.

The Court has repeatedly affirmed that the margin in this area is wide (see Mathieu‑Mohin and Clerfayt , cited above, § 52; Matthews v. the United Kingdom [GC], no.

I return to what was said by the European Court in paragraph 52 of its judgment in Mathieu-Mohin.

Machold, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The respondent Government are represented by Ambassador F.

    In Mathieu-Mohin and Clerfayt v.

Machold, a lawyer practising in Vienna. The Austrian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ambassador F.

    Mathilde Elizabeth Lupker, a Dutch citizen born in 1967 and resident at Nijmegen (the first applicant).   2.

The assessment of this minimum level of severity is relative; it depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical and mental effects and, in some cases,

Since neither the Constitution nor the statutes regulated the manner or duration of the application of Article   132 of the Constitution, the applicant argued that the said provision should have been

(b)     Persons finally convicted of one of the offences provided for in the Criminal Code or the Military Criminal Code, for the duration of their sentence. “ Article 6 – Exercise of the right