cassation

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 11.

Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§   68 ‑ 73, 17 January 2023).      ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 of the Convention 7.

de l’homme (ci-après nommées «   la Convention   » et «   la Cour   »),   Vu l’arrêt définitif transmis par la Cour au Comité dans cette affaire et la violation de l’article 10

I further undertake not to request the reference of the case to the Grand Chamber pursuant to Article 43 § 1 of the Convention after the delivery of the Court’s judgment.” 10.

Hacı Ali Açıkgül, chef du service des droits de l’homme au ministère de la Justice de la Türkiye, le grief tiré de l’article 10 de la Convention et de déclarer irrecevable la requête pour le surplus, Vu

The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention, concerning its liability to pay the success fees and after-the-event insurance premium of a claimant who issued libel proceedings against

The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention concerning the freedom of expression were communicated to the Polish Government (“the Government”).

The applicants’ complaints under Article 10 of the Convention concerning freedom of expression were communicated to the Polish Government (“the Government”).

The applicant’s complaint under Article 10 of the Convention concerning a breach of his right to freedom of expression was communicated to the Portuguese Government (“the Government”).

Case Judgment of Final on 21793/14 Kitsos 22/09/2022 22/09/2022   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

Relying on Article 10 of the Convention, the applicant further complains that his right to freedom of expression was infringed by the sanctions imposed. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

    In a judgment delivered on 26 March 2024, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention on account of defamation proceedings against the applicant.

”);   Having regard to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violation of Article 10 of the Convention established;   Recalling the respondent State

    As in MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom (no. 39401/04, 18 January 2011), the present case concerned the compatibility with Article 10 of the Convention of the recoverability of success fees

The applicants complained under Article 10 of the Convention that the disciplinary sanctions constituted a breach of their right to freedom of expression.

The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention concerning her unsuccessful attempts, as an investigative journalist, to obtain information on details of public procurement were communicated

The applicant’s complaints under Article 10 of the Convention concerning criminal proceedings brought against him for aggravated defamation against a lawyer were communicated to the Portuguese Government

10 de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales, de l'article 78 de la loi n° 86-1067 relative à la liberté de communication du 30 septembre 1986, de l'article