From 1995 the District Court conducted execution proceedings by means of the sale of the defendant’s movable property. It appears that the execution proceedings are still pending.

    The Government noted that the deliberations of a District Court were secret.

sitting on 22   November 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre

plaidant du barreau de PARIS, toque : J053 DÉFENDERESSE AU CONTREDIT : Société HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO.LIMITED prise en la personne de ses représentants légaux Immeuble Huawei Bantian District

    The application was dismissed by the Warsaw Praga-Północ District Court on 14 November 2014.

On 12   September   2005 the court found that the Cracow District Court had jurisdiction. 11.     On 23 July 2008 the Cracow District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim.

    Principaux faits   Le requérant, Alexandre Riabikine, est un ressortissant turkmène d’origine ethnique russe né en 1953 à Achkhabad (Turkménistan).

On 4 May 2004 the Buiucani District Court upheld another request for a stay of the enforcement proceedings for two months. The applicant company appealed.

  On 14 January 1991 the District Court dismissed the applicants' request.

Petkov TOMOV and Mariana Petrova NIKOLOVA against Bulgaria lodged on 9 June 2009 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicants, Mr Alexander Petkov Tomov and Ms Mariana Petrova Nikolova, are Bulgarian nationals,

sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 40230/03 by Alexander

On 31 October 2001 the victim brought an action for damages against the applicant’s insurance company in the Prague 5 District Court ( obvodní soud ).

    Application no. 25197/11 lodged on 11   April 2011 by Alexandru   URSU, who was born on 10   April 1981 and lives in Hagimus, represented by Alexandru POSTICA.   7.

    On 26 January 2008 the Udine District Court ordered a second expert assessment. 8.

Alexandru Obregia, in Bucharest. According to the police report, the applicant was “verbally aggressive”, “incoherent” and “agitated”.

Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 8 July 2008, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants are twenty-seven Russian nationals living in the Sysolskiy District

demeurant [Adresse 1] Représentés tous deux et assistés sur l'audience par Me Antoine BEAUQUIER de l'ASSOCIATION BOKEN, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R191, substitué sur l'audience par Me Alexandre

Alexandre DAVID, Président de chambre a rendu compte des débats à la Cour composée de : Monsieur Alexandre DAVID, président de chambre, président de la collégialité, Madame Laurence DUVALLET, présidente

    On 2 March 2011 the Gryfice District Court transferred the case to the Września District Court. 10.