font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 7 September 2020 Published on 28 September 2020   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 58721/16 Marina

Brassens, 94550 Chevilly-Larue, 77 / Mme Maria FD...

:avoid } .s29100277 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 16 September 2024   FOURTH SECTION Application no. 16110/23 Bernardo Maria

’s son and did they adequately assess its seriousness (see, Lakatošová and Lakatoš v.

She did not have any other housing or family support. Her eldest son had been killed in Chechnya while another son did not have any housing of his own.

She further argues that the national courts did not respond adequately to her key arguments.

She did not submit any claims under Article   41 of the Convention.

G... à contracter mariage avec M. U...

  W. had referred to the fact that T. did apparently not intend to resign.   He had stated in particular that he did not want to participate in a hunt.

By decision no. 1/24.04.2024, the Court of Cassation held that the applicant political party did not fulfil the conditions for participating in the European elections of 9 June 2024 as it did not serve

)   ;   Maria Lucília Jorge Rato Pinto, née en 1935 et résidant à Lisbonne, héritière de Helena Jorge Rato (part sociale de 14,28%)   ;   Maria Celeste Jorge Ribeiro, née en 1926 et

The applicants did not appeal against that court judgment. 5.

By letter of 2 February 2016, the applicants’ lawyer informed the Registry that the first applicant, Ms Mária Schmutzová, had passed away on   26   October 2015.

Maria de Lourdes, épouse D... B..., - D... B... Antonio, - I... Philippe, - C...

FRAIKIN ASSETS / Association ASSOCIATION REGIONALE POUR LA PROMOTION DE LA DIAL YSE A DOMICILE Nature affaire : 56B TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE REIMS PÔLE CIVIL JUGEMENT DU 10 AVRIL 2026 DEMANDERESSE

  QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the decisions to expel the applicants, aliens lawfully resident in the territory of the respondent State, comply with the procedural requirements of Article   1

At the material time, the applicants were living in Manisa (Türkiye).

[1] Marina Kovtun, who was on the prisoner exchange list, I and the regional prosecutors contacted the Prosecutor General and he supported us, she was struck off the list.

    In this connection, the Court observes that the applicants did not provide the correct bank details and the relevant supporting documents until February   2019 and did not explain the

AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE, en son audience publique tenue au Palais de Justice à PARIS, le quinze septembre mil neuf cent quatre-vingt-dix-neuf, a rendu l'arrêt