CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

252 résultats pour « Saïd Hadir »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245323

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2025

4 septembre 2025

Türkiye 07/10/2021 Ahmet Hamdi KAYA 1964 Turkish 179. 52476/21 Cebeci v. Türkiye 20/10/2021 Mehmet CEBECİ 1965 Antalya Turkish 180. 52566/21 Doğan v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD006081810

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2016

25 octobre 2016

The front cover of Profil had the words: “ Kärntner Hypo ‑ Affäre – Wie viel wusste Haider? ” (“Carinthian Hypo affair - How much did Haider know?”). 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1206DEC001460005

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2005

6 décembre 2005

Up until then Mrs Eskinazi and Mr Chelouche had had joint custody of their daughter.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1550080-1627613

Admin. suprême

6 janvier 2006

6 janvier 2006

In addition, the investigation had only been directed against the PKK and no other leads had been followed up.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1808375-1900046

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2006

10 octobre 2006

His identity had thus been affected and he had no way of clarifying the matter.   The applicant complained in particular, that he had no legal means to challenge the declaration of paternity.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1124JUD001528789

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 1994

24 novembre 1994

Conseil d’Etat had now discontinued it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1019DEC002189593

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1994

19 octobre 1994

This was apparently caused by a mine which had exploded under a police tank or panzer.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0116JUD000687505

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2018

16 janvier 2018

The applicants argued that the purpose of the article had been to raise concern over the fact that some high-ranking officials had not been tried and that those accused in Metin Göktepe’s trial had still

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD005725800

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2006

19 décembre 2006

The applicant submitted that he did not remember whether he had said the words published in Hürriyet since he spoke impromptu at the meeting and that his speech had been a criticism of the general economic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1216JUD005783719

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

in that judgment had related to the specific facts of that case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113200

Admin. suprême

27 août 2012

27 août 2012

In that regard, it was considered that the first applicant’s family’s standard of living had not declined and that she had three other sets of relatives, none of whom were said to be poor or to have expressly

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-238001

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2024

12 novembre 2024

Türkiye 04/11/2022 Atilla ESER 1968 Ankara Turkish Hamdi Kenan SEVİNÇ 13. 52662/22 Emektar v. Türkiye 03/11/2022 Ahmet EMEKTAR 1979 Istanbul Turkish Samed ÖZBULUT 14. 52704/22 Sert v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233566

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

Türkiye 12/05/2022 Ali ÖKSÜZ 1987 Osmaniye Turkish Said Emre DOKUYUCU 23. 25441/22 Kurga v. Türkiye 13/05/2022 Nedim KURGA 1983 Kocaeli Turkish Mehmet ÇAVDAR 24. 25479/22 Nacar v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD000458709

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2018

24 avril 2018

In addition, they had suffered non-pecuniary damage as they had been unaware of their son’s whereabouts for a long time and had been forced to initiate a search for him; they had been unable to properly

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021JUD003945703

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2008

21 octobre 2008

He further said that Mehmet Dilsiz, chairman of the HADEP’s Cizre branch, had been threatened, arrested and detained by the Gendarmerie Command on the basis of fake documents and without any evidence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229836

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2023

12 décembre 2023

Türkiye 07/01/2021 Hamdi ÇEÇEN 1970 Niğde Turkish Adem ÇEÇEN   6681/21 Örküt v. Türkiye 06/01/2021 Hüseyin ÖRKÜT 1973 Manisa Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN   6978/21 Çınar v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD000798809

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

had been premature.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-245311

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2025

4 septembre 2025

Türkiye 11/05/2021 Hamdi BOLGI 1981 Ordu Turkish 165. 25744/21 Yıldız v. Türkiye 30/04/2021 Ali Ersin YILDIZ 1983 Ankara Turkish 166. 25836/21 Şahin v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD001017105

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

Wissem AL HADI HANACHI Algérien, né le 11/4/1984   Ajournée Renonce 20. M. Ibrahime CHNATIKA Marocain, né le 8/4/1977   Ajournée 21. M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0313DEC001908308

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2018

13 mars 2018

However, after the land had been acquired, the mayor, in a number of decisions, had refused to issue the requested zoning permit. Eventually the applicant company had had to sell the land.

Source officielle

Page 11 sur 13

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.