According to the applicants’ lawyer, since 28   November 2009 he has lost contact with the applicants.

refused to discuss with them any and all aspects of her application, including such related to the friendly settlement proposal and the claims for just satisfaction, from which they concluded that she had lost

E..., représentés par Me Louette-Leclercq, demandent au juge des référés : 1°) de suspendre, sur le fondement de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, l’exécution de l’arrêté n° PC 080

M + MATERIAUX [Adresse 2] [Localité 2] Représentée par Me Thomas LOUETTE de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ ET ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau D'AMIENS Ayant pour avocat plaidant Me Celine ALCALDE de la SELARL

A B, la confiscation du bateau Louette stationnant sans droit ni titre sur le domaine public fluvial au port de Dijon.

    The applicant sought compensation, which comprised damages for lost earnings from 1974 to 1990, for lost earnings and benefits from 1990 to 1991, and for alleged moral suffering due to the

The applicant company lost the property over the land and was ordered to pay 11,138,275 Romanian lei (“RON”) to the plaintiffs, corresponding to the value of the demolished hotel.

A B, représenté par Me Loste, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite par laquelle la direction des infrastructures, de la topographie et des transports de la Nouvelle-Calédonie a rejeté

(c)     The applicant company’s lost profits 46.

He also requested compensation for the lost income from the family’s carpet-weaving and bread-making businesses.

    In addition, the applicant claimed EUR 12,142 for lost opportunity on account of not being able to use the garage to which he was entitled between 1978 and 2008.

It held that since the interim measure had already lost effect as it prohibited a meeting in the past, its review would be immaterial.

The court dismissed the claim in respect of lost profit as unsubstantiated. 6.     The applicant appealed.

According to those provisions, any party to the proceedings may apply to the court which delivered the judgment for restoration of a lost case file.

HFI DELAHAYE 1106 rue de la Dune 80550 LE CROTOY Représentant : Maître Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ ET ASSOCIES, avocats au barreau d’AMIENS Jugement contradictoire et en

B A, représenté par la SELARL Louette-Leclerq et associés, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, la suspension de l'exécution

Invoking Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the applicant complains that he was not informed of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court initiated by a private party who had previously lost a civil

All 298   persons on board lost their lives.

The applicant complains under Article 6 and 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention that the proceedings were not fair and that he had lost property on that account.