64886/01) concerning proceedings of the same type that had lasted more than eight years for two levels of jurisdiction and in the Riccardi Pizzati v.

ACCORD D’ENTREPRISE PORTANT SUR LA MISE EN PLACE DU FORFAIT ANNUEL EN JOURS ET LA DEROGATION EXCEPTIONNELLE A LA DUREE DU REPOS QUOTIDIEN AU SEIN DE LA SARL BOARDS & MORE FRANCE

These claims were examined and allowed under the rules pertaining to unjust enrichment, with no consideration to bonos mores being given.

Police Station; Giurgiu and Craiova Prisons; Jilava and Rahova Prison Hospitals 03/02/2010 to 23/07/2012 2 year(s) and 5 month(s) and 21 day(s)   Drobeta-Turnu Severin Prison 23/12/2019 pending More

    The Court observes in the present case that, even deducting the in-cell sanitary facility from the overall surface area of the cell, the applicants disposed of more than 4 sq. m of personal

Art. 5 (3) - excessive length of pre-trial detention - 12/10/2017 – pending, more than 4 years, based on standard grounds without analysis of risks or alternative measures,   Art. 5 (5) - lack of,

  8 23/12/2001 pending More than 22 year(s) and 8   month(s) and 22   day(s) 3.6 m² Lack of fresh air, overcrowding, lack of privacy for toilet, stench of toilet, mouldy cell, insufficient

in euros) [1]     36668/17 16/05/2017 Sergey Alekseyevich IKONNIKOV 1987     various correctional facilities, including IK-15 and IK-5, Nizhniy Novgorod Region 20/08/2010 pending More

(b)     If so, does it pursue one or more of the legitimate aims referred to in Article 8 § 2 of the Convention?

Turkey (preliminary objections) - 19092/91 Judgment 7.8.1996 Article 35 Article 35-3 Ratione temporis Treatment suffered while in police custody more than a month before Turkey had recognised Court's compulsory

DEMANDE Monsieur [T] [Y] [C], es qualité de représentant légal de l’enfant [F] [Y] [C] né le [Date naissance 2] 2020 à [Localité 9] (COMORES) [Adresse 3] [Localité 7] représenté par Maître Arthur MORE

[Adresse 5] [Localité 6] (bénéficie d’une aide juridictionnelle Totale numéro 2022/005591 du 14/11/2022 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de ST DENIS REUNION) représenté par Me Arthur MORE

He was charged with gross indecency under S. 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 1956 (the decriminalisation of sexual acts between consenting adult males in private not applying when there are more than two

text-indent:35.45pt; text-align:justify } resolution DH   (2000) 46 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 29 SEPTEMBER 1999 (FINAL ON 29 DECEMBER 1999) IN THE CASE OF MOORE

The provision for disenfranchisement set out in section   22 of the National Assembly Election Act was more detailed than the provisions that had been applicable in Hirst .

He was remanded in custody during the investigation and subsequent trial for more than seven months. He was found guilty as charged and sentenced to four years’ imprisonment.

Vu 3°, sous le n° 373438, la requête, enregistrée le 22 novembre 2013 au secrétariat du contentieux du Conseil d'Etat, présentée par la société Preview Creative et More, dont le siège est au 13 rue des

Par un mémoire en défense, enregistré le 8 décembre 2022, les sociétés More Architecture et Coco Architecture, représentées par Me Julien Mazille, déclarent ne pas s'opposer à la demande d'extension de