Has there been a violation of Article 5 of the Convention?   Was the applicant (Mr Ara Hayk Ghazaryan) deprived of his liberty in breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention?

    The case concerns a complaint under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention about the refusal to hold the publisher of an Internet news portal liable for hate speech in users’ comments. 2 .

Pour statuer ainsi, la Cour a estimé qu'en application de la loi des 16 et 24 août 1790, des articles L. 199 et L. 281 du livre des procédures fiscales et 49, alinéa 2, du code de procédure civile, la

SLU [Adresse 2] AD [Localité 2] - [Localité 2] [Localité 2] (ESPAGNE) représentée par Me Philippe GOSSET, de la SELARL JURISOPHIA, avocat au barreau d’ANNECY COMPOSITION DE LA JURIDICTION : statuant

The applicants complain under Article 17 of the Convention that the State failed to hold the respondents liable for dissemination of hate speech and afforded hate speech protection under Article 10 of

46, paragraph 1, have been adopted,   DECLARES that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in these cases and   DECIDES to close the examination thereof

111 § 2 (d) of the CC); the investigator classified the offence and that against Ms P. as aggravated beating (Article 116 § 2).

obligation under Article   2.

de propriété et à la liberté d'exercice protégés par l'article 8 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme et l'article 2 de la loi du 31 décembre 1971, - acter que ces faits font l'objet d'une

In his view, they had amounted to offences under Articles 144 §§ 2 and 3, 164 § 1 and 320 of the Criminal Code (respectively, threats against a religious official, death threats, hate speech, and overt

It raises issues under Article   3 of the Convention in conjunction with Article   14 of the Convention. THE FACTS 2.

. : Sur le premier moyen de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 6-1 et 10 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, 668, 665, 662, 674-1, 485, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale

Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two German nationals, Mrs Cornelia Haase and Mr   Josef Haase (“the applicants”), on 6 March 2002. 2.

What remains to be decided is whether his conviction complied with Article 10 of the Convention. alleged violation of article 10 of the convention 27.

37 of the European Convention on Human Rights. 2.

6-1 de la Convention européenne des droits d l'homme, 121-2, 121-3 et 221-6 du Code pénal, 575, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale ; " en ce que l'arrêt rendu par la chambre de l'instruction a déclaré

d’enfant («   la Convention de La Haye   »). 6.

and Article 59 bis §§ 2, 2 bis and 3 of the Constitution, sections 17 and 18 of the 1980 Special Act); additionally, their Executives have power to make regulations (section 20 of the 1980 Special Act)