The first five applicants were born in 1929, 1970, 1934, 1929 and 1934 respectively and live in Zagreb.

Lawless was charged: (a) with possession of incriminating documents contrary to section 12 of the 1939 Act; (b) with membership of an unlawful organisation, the IRA, contrary to section 21 of the 1939

the Convention and Article 2 of Protocol No.

Mardin   Ayten KARAASLAN 05/05/1979 Mardin   Asya OKTAY 01/02/1949 Mardin   Abdülmecit ERTAŞ 01/01/1949 Mardin   Abas KARAASLAN 10/03/1940 Mardin     Zerga İLHAN 01/01/1955

  41823/09 , lodged on 27/07/2009   Fermi Osma 13/04/1926 Karaman   Osman Osma 08/09/1955 Karaman   Şerife Polat 01/01/1959 Karaman   Şadiye Ersoy 01/04/1967 Karaman   Asiye

2007 3 October 2001, Krasnyy Luch Court 12 January 2012 1,785   49278/07 ZINCHENKO YURIY IVANOVICH, 1958 30 October 2007 3 May 2006, Krasnyy Luch Court 12 July /2011 915   787/08 TISHCHENKO

37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).

for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by the applicants listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates and with the various representatives

In that connection, and having regard to the number of persons potentially affected by the systemic violation of the Convention, the Court directed that “the respondent State must, through appropriate

    On 14 October 1992 the Supreme Council passed amendments to another law, to the effect that all regulations issued by the former State Bank of the USSR were null and void on the territory

    Remaining complaints Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

Le 15 octobre 1996, le président répondit notamment que l’article 8 (droit au respect de la correspondance) de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme n’interdisait pas la censure de la correspondance

Turkey (No. 2) (no. 30465/02), judgment of 12 December 2006 Akkan and Erkizilkaya v. Turkey (no. 48055/99), judgment of 24 October 2006 Anter and Others v.

The applicants also raised other complaints under various provisions of the Convention and its Protocols. 3.

In its report of 21 October 1999 (former Article 31 of the Convention) [ Note by the Registry .

Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.

  Romania (nos. 30767/05 et 33800/06, §§ 44 et seq., 12 October 2010); Preda and Others (cited above, §§ 68-74); and Dickmann and Gion v.

of 29 September/ 30   October 1923) and Articles 42 and 45 of the Treaty of Lausanne (ratified by decree of 25   August 1923) (see paragraphs 65-68 below).

  37487/03, 1195/04, 21121/04 and 33435/04, also raised various complaints under Article 6 of the Convention which the Court has carefully examined.

NICOLINI   12.