CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD000463702
24 novembre 2009
On 21 August 2000 A.V.I. lodged a criminal complaint for insult and defamation against the applicant with Timişoara District Court.
Page 19 sur 58
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC002145903
15 mai 2007
Le 9 juillet 2004, le tribunal de district (Okresní soud) de Mělník ordonna l’exécution du paiement de l’amende.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0303DEC000773002
3 mars 2005
Devant la Cour, il est représenté par Me Alexander Moser, avocat à Baden-Baden, qui a été désigné par le tribunal aux affaires successorales ( Nachlassgericht ) de Baden-Baden comme curateur de
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0918JUD002508811
18 septembre 2014
Their house was situated in proximity to the Achkhoy-Martan district military commander’s office. 13.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-2071848-2198076
20 juillet 2007
A l’époque des faits, il était conseiller de district.
6ème chambre 1ère section
670eb28d1c3411ff34535a76
15 octobre 2024
NOX INGENIERIE 3 boulevard du Zénith 44800 SAINT HERBLAIN non représentée Monsieur [B] [S] 9 avenue Taillebourg 75011 PARIS non représenté Société SERMAT Avenue Pasteur ZI du District 85607 MONTAIGU
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0908DEC006219300
8 septembre 2005
In its judgment the Sofia District Court found that the questioning and warning had been lawful.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1204JUD004714306
4 décembre 2015
Le 5 décembre 2005, le tribunal du district Vassileostrovski de Saint-Pétersbourg (« le tribunal de district ») débouta le requérant au motif qu’il n’avait pas démontré que
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1031JUD002696006
31 octobre 2013
He immediately contacted the Chechnya Prosecutor’s Office and the Prosecutor’s Office of the Achkhoy-Martan District (“the district prosecutor’s office”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1108JUD004972511
8 novembre 2018
On 1 June 2000 the applicant asked the Cracow District Inspector of Construction Supervision ( Powiatowy Inspektor Nadzoru Budowlanego – “the District Inspector”) to institute proceedings
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD004135410
13 novembre 2012
On 15 May 2008 the applicant instituted divorce proceedings before the Moscow Kuzminskiy District Court (“the district court”).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0306JUD001667817
6 mars 2025
On 15/08/2019 complaint to the Basmanniy district investigative committee/No reply followed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1011DEC001168003
11 octobre 2011
It appears that the applicants retained doubts as to the identity of the body found in Istra District on 26 May 1995.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0530DEC005362616
30 mai 2017
The ordinary prosecution service consisted of prosecutors at the Prosecutor General’s Office, the appellate prosecutor’s offices, regional prosecutor’s offices and district prosecutor’s offices. 2.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113DEC001087325
13 janvier 2026
Referring to the Court’s case-law and Articles 8 and 10 of the Convention, the Lisbon District Court recognised that the ongoing criminal investigation into J.S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002621607
17 avril 2014
On 3 March 1995 the Sovetskiy District Court of Voronezh (“the District Court”) gave judgment in the applicant’s favour, obliging the Administration of Voronezh (“the town council”) to: “
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0717JUD004235113
17 juillet 2014
On 10 July 2012 the Severnyy District Court of Orel examined the Severnyy district prosecutor’s request to extend the applicant’s detention for four months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1008JUD004902108
8 octobre 2020
On the same date the applicant was brought before the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan (hereafter, the District Court) which examined the investigator’s application seeking
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1211JUD002290910
11 décembre 2014
1 p.m. in Prague 4 District Court, but O.H. did not say anything in reply and hung up.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD002215205
25 septembre 2012
On 11 March 2003 the Krasnoarmeyskiy District Court of Volgograd (hereinafter “the District Court”) ordered the applicant’s detention on remand with reference to Articles 97-101 and 108 of