CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
10e Chambre
6034f39fb4acc121ae8bc1fc
25 juillet 2016
Conformément à l'article 785 du Code de Procédure Civile, Madame Christiane BELIERES, Présidente, a fait un rapport oral de l'affaire à l'audience avant les plaidoiries.
Page 2 sur 2
MEE Civil Contentieux
6a0b9180cdc6046d4720b61c
18 mai 2026
Sur la demande de la Sci Chef [O] à l’encontre de M.
Affaires Contentieuses
6a0b7680cdc6046d471e9b59
BESSIERE, avocat au barreau de l’Aveyron GROUPAMA D’OC, dont le siège social est [Adresse 5] représentée par Me Marie-Madeleine SALLES, avocat au barreau de l’Aveyron, avocat postulant et la
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0611JUD001527116
11 juin 2020
15842/16) and Mr Maxime Roll (application no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD008111417
13 octobre 2020
They all failed their baccalaureate because they did not obtain the required grades to pass the exams in Romanian language and literature (Ms Ádám, Mr Petres, Mr Bakos, Mr Forika and Mr Maxem) or
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0304DEC001120884
4 mars 1986
They do, however, seek separation from republican prisoners who have sworn to kill and maim them.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511
1 juillet 2014
Scope of the Law 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD007357917
18 février 2020
As has been mentioned above, the examination of cases of administrative-law violations does not fall within the scope of public administration.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0408JUD002207719
8 avril 2025
The extension of the immunity beyond freedom of speech in the House was recently confirmed by the Supreme Court in R (SC) v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910
3 avril 2014
The term “refugee” refers to an alien who is outside the country of his or her nationality owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted on grounds of race, nationality, religious or political beliefs
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD004886610
19 décembre 2013
In particular, armed groups continue to employ tactics that deliberately target crowded public areas and kill and maim civilians indiscriminately.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0710DEC004157198
10 juillet 2001
for the Home Department informed Parliament on 6 December 1988 that, against the background of the terrorist campaign, and the over-riding need to bring terrorists to justice, the Government did not believe
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0325JUD001313487
25 mars 1993
The headmaster was of the opinion that the applicant "strung his parents along", taking home stories about bullying and the like "which he has clearly made up but which equally clearly his parents believe
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0827DEC002854020
27 août 2024
On the same day the Court rejected the applicant’s request as it fell outside the scope of Rule 39. 27 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1105JUD007308717
5 novembre 2020
set reasonable and proportionate maxima for awards for damages and interest in defamation cases so that the viability of a defendant media organ is not placed at risk; 17.9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD006418411
28 juin 2018
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:1026JUD000918680
26 octobre 1984
In any event, the principles and the rule relied on in the ground of appeal do not have the scope therein suggested; From the sole fact that a trial judge inquired into the case as an investigating judge
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD001116111
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1219JUD000123111