cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 5] [Localité 3] représentée par Me Dejan MIHAJLOVIC de la SELARL DAUPHIN ET MIHAJLOVIC, avocat au barreau de GRENOBLE, postulant et plaidant par Me Jean-Thomas KROELL

    On 31 July 2000 the applicant paid 1,600 Norwegian kroner to the bailiff. 34.     On 14 September 2000 the bailiff referred the case file to the Warsaw District Court. 35.

Ireland , 26 May 1994, § 49, Series A no. 290; and Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , cited above). 40.

border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:bottom }       FORMER FIFTH SECTION               CASE OF BERGER-KRALL

The fourth applicant company, Kroc Kft, is a limited liability company with its registered office in Budapest.

[KRO] [MAB] [Adresse 2847] [Localité 2071] M. [TRV] [YHG] [Adresse 2142] [Localité 2535] Mlle [IP] [AAL] [Adresse 3127] [Localité 2945] M.

According to surveys made by the customs and tax authorities, approximately one thousand six hundred companies with a total tax debt exceeding 2 billion Danish kroner (DKK) were stripped in the period

Court H.R., Keegan judgment of 26 May 1994, Series A no. 290, pp. 17-18, para. 44; Kroon judgment of 27 October 1994, to be published in Series A no. 297-C, para. 31).

Draft accounts were submitted on 10   January and 1   March 1995 showing that the applicant had committed fraudulent conversion for an amount of approximately 2.477.112 Danish kroner (DKK).

Nykøbing Sj.( retten i Nykøbing Sj .) found the applicant guilty of the charges brought against him following an evaluation of the available evidence and sentenced him to pay a fine of 1,000 Danish kroner

Their convictions were upheld on appeal to the High Court, which sentenced them to 20 day-fines of 400 Danish kroner (DKK) (approximately 53 euros (EUR)) and ordered them to pay DKK   75,000 (approximately

By a judgment of 19 February 2010 the Tartu Court of Appeal upheld the County Court’s judgment in substance but modified the sentence and fined the applicant 15,000 kroons (EEK, approximately 959 &#xa0

    Relevant domestic law For the relevant background concerning socially-owned flats and “specially protected tenancy” in the former Socialist Republic of Slovenia see Berger-Krall and Others

          Le 30 octobre 1982, le requérant fit appel de la décision du Ministre devant la Couronne (de Kroon).

protégés par l’article 8, au regard du but d’intérêt général poursuivi par l’expropriation litigieuse et du fait que les intéressés ont déjà reçu une indemnité provisoire adéquate (comparer avec Ber ger-Krall

The proceedings ended with the Crown (Kroon) decision of 18 November 1986 in which the approval of the plan was annulled.

Irlande du 26 mai 1994, série A n° 290, p. 19, § 49, et l’arrêt Kroon et autres c. Pays-Bas du 27 octobre 1994, Série A n o 297-C, p. 56, § 31).

Irlande , 26   mai   1994, § 44, série A n o 290, et Kroon et autres c. Pays-Bas , 27   octobre 1994, § 30, série A n o 297 ‑ C).

refusal, the Municipal Authorities of Haarlemmerliede and Spaarnwoude, the Forestry Board (Bosschap) and a number of applicants (those numbered to 36 inclusive as appended) appealed to the Crown (de Kroon

An amount of 404,500 Danish kroner (DKK), equivalent to approximately 54,000 euros (EUR), and gold jewellery found in the applicant’s home during a search were confiscated as profit from the crimes.