CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD000020522
18 juillet 2024
They relied on Article 5 § 3 of the Convention. 7.
Page 25 sur 851
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0319DEC002787012
19 mars 2019
Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention and complaints of Mr Ananenko (application no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1216DEC003965505
16 décembre 2008
23 du code civil, l'article 49 de la Constitution et l'article 8 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC002691721
6 septembre 2022
THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 alone and in conjunction with Article 13 of the Convention 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0612JUD002283218
12 juin 2025
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 of the Convention 7.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:003-1952421-2065795
22 mars 2007
Maslov invoquait l’article 8 (droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale) de la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0723JUD003879497
23 juillet 2002
The Court takes note of the agreement reached between the parties (Article 39 of the Convention).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204DEC000572309
4 février 2020
The applicants complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d) of the Convention that they were not provided an opportunity to examine the prosecution witnesses during trial. THE LAW 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0427DEC000906908
27 avril 2017
Remaining complaints The applicant in application no. 32425/10 also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC003555505
2 mai 2017
They relied, in particular, on Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. 18.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0204DEC004616012
» Sur l’application de l’article 6 de la Convention 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0223JUD003195005
23 février 2010
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 6 OF THE CONVENTION 52.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328DEC003405696
28 mars 2000
L’article 6 § 1 de la Convention est inapplicable en la matière.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-246108
21 octobre 2025
to the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0105DEC000780507
5 janvier 2017
The applicants complained under Article 3 of the Convention about the lack of requisite medical assistance and under Article 13 about the lack of an effective remedy to complain about poor medical assistance
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0912JUD004884114
12 septembre 2024
complaints under Article 6 of the Convention; Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the unlawful detention (deprivation of liberty); Holds that
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0409REP002148193
9 avril 1997
As regards Article 6 of the Convention (paras. 22-28) 4 CONCLUSION (para. 28) 5 APPENDIX : DECISION OF THE COMMISSION
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215DEC005604207
15 décembre 2016
Remaining complaints Some applicants also raised other complaints under various articles of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0413JUD003682111
13 avril 2017
Admissibility 22. The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-235176
17 juin 2024
Relying on Article 3 of the Convention, the applicants in applications nos.