CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD000958003
7 février 2017
  Ukraine (satisfaction équitable), n o   48553/99, §§ 52- 55, 2 octobre 2003, Todorova et autres c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0622JUD003793115
22 juin 2017
Roumanie (n o 2) , n o 1285/03 , §§ 86 et 114, 19 février 2013, Todorova c. Italie , n o 33932/06 , § 75, 13 janvier 2009, Zhou c.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1108JUD004511698
8 novembre 2007
Bulgarie , n os 43278/98 et huit autres requêtes, 15   mars 2007, §§ 46-51, le cas Todorova , n o 48380/99). C.     L’action en nullité d’un contrat 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0121JUD003377311
21 janvier 2014
Roumanie (n o   2) , n o 1285/03, §§ 86 et 114, 19 février 2013   ; Todorova   c.   Italie , n o   33932/06, § 75, 13 janvier 2009). 59.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0429DEC005655816
29 avril 2025
La Cour ne voit, en l’absence d’indice d’arbitraire, aucune raison de s’écarter de la conclusion à laquelle est parvenue la juridiction interne sur ce point ( voir, mutatis mutandis, Miroslava Todorova
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD002569219
5 octobre 2023
of or insufficient electric light, lack of seasonal clothes, mouldy or dirty cell, infestation of cell with insects/rodents   5,000     28306/19 13/05/2019 Vyacheslav Vladimirovich TOPORKOV
cr
613726a3cd58014677427472
19 octobre 2005
Attendu qu'il résulte de l'arrêt attaqué que Didier X..., agent de joueurs, a dirigé de fait les sociétés ayant successivement géré l'équipe de basket-ball du Cercle Saint-Pierre de Limoges et qu'il a
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1130JUD000321919
30 novembre 2023
numerous occasions in a metal cage in court hearings before the Tsentralnyy District Court of Novosibirsk; since 21/10/2017 and pending as of 16/09/2022 8,500   4891/19 14/12/2018 Sergey Pavlovich TOPORKOV
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD001055811
15 janvier 2015
or death, the above obligation calls for an effective independent judicial system to ensure enforcement of the aforementioned legislative framework by providing appropriate redress (see, e.g., Anna Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1211DEC001635402
11 décembre 2007
Veselin Petrov IVANOV 8/07/1999 30/11/2000 4 714.23 21/05/2001 30/08/2001 499.20 8   170.00 3   430.00 69.60 200.00 12/02/2003 25/02/2003 3   861.79 42.65 25 21052/02 22/08/2002 Svetla Todorova
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0502DEC000395211
2 mai 2017
Bulgaria , no. 59548/00, § 83, 17 January 2008; Anna Todorova v.   Bulgaria , no. 23302/03, § 72, 24 May 2011; and Ciechońska v. Poland , no.   19776/04, § 66, 14 June 2011).
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1202REP002260093
2 décembre 1996
                                  étran
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325JUD002571405
25 mars 2014
Todorova, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms N. Nikolova, of the Ministry of Justice. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD005425200
11 décembre 2008
The Court considers that in this respect the present case is similar to a certain extent to the cases of Todorova and Eneva and Dobrev , examined in its Velikovi and Others judgment (see §§ 236-249 of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103JUD002869703
3 novembre 2009
wiping out all the consequences of the interference in question, and compensation need not always equal the full value of the property (for recapitulation of the Court's practice see, for example, Todorova
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-223755
2 mars 2023
fresh air, poor quality of food, lack of or insufficient electric light, lack of seasonal clothes, infestation of cell with insects/rodents     28306/19 13/05/2019 Vyacheslav Vladimirovich TOPORKOV
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0127JUD002446004
27 janvier 2011
Russia , no. 19223/04, §§ 44-50, 30 July 2009; Toporkov v. Russia , no.   66688/01, §§   28-35, 1 October 2009, and Lopata v. Russia , no.   72250/01, § 107, 13   July 2010).
ECLI:CEDH:001-177370
4 septembre 2017
9 and 10 of the Convention, on account of the fact that one of the two main grounds on which the court rested the decision was the witness statement by a Russian Orthodox priest (compare Paraskeva Todorova
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD001039304
5 avril 2011
Russia , no. 8413/02, § 57 et seq., 14 May 2009; Toporkov v. Russia , no.   66688/01, § 45 et seq., 1 October 2009; and Isayev v. Russia , no.   20756/04, §§ 100-102, 22 October 2009). 70.
ECLI:CEDH:001-224279
30 mars 2023
in court hearings before the Tsentralnyy District Court of Novosibirsk; 21/10/2017 – ongoing on the date when the application was lodged with the Court   4891/19* 14/12/2018 Sergey Pavlovich TOPORKOV
Page 26 sur 27