CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1205JUD004643509
5 décembre 2019
THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The first applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Yerevan.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108JUD004788111
8 janvier 2019
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1945 and lives in Cluj-Napoca.
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0516REP001909291
16 mai 1995
   ETABLISSEMENT DES FAITS   A.     Circonstances particulières de l'affaire   16.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0620JUD001807802
20 juin 2006
THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.     The applicant was born in 1963 and lived in Istanbul at the material time. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003475904
21 décembre 2010
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 3.     The applicants are Turkish nationals who were arrested and subsequently detained pending judicial proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020JUD000570102
20 octobre 2005
THE FACTS 8.     The applicant was born in 1974 and lives in Istanbul. 9.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120JUD007093410
20 novembre 2018
À l’époque des faits, il était détenu dans un centre pénitentiaire à Erzurum. 31.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC003192406
13 décembre 2016
Ce jugement est devenu définitif et n’a pas fait l’objet d’un pourvoi en cassation. b.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005023911
13 juin 2023
    The applicant alleged that he had not had a fair trial in that the trial court had convicted him in the absence of any evidence and without adducing adequate reasons. 30.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-176194
12 juillet 2017
Istanbul   Ayşe HACIMİRZAOĞLU 15/02/1955 Istanbul   Meral HANBAYAT Article   5 §   4 de la Convention     55061/12 26/06/2012 Mehmet GÜNEŞ 01/01/1951 Tekirdağ   Ercan KANAR
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC000948605
25 janvier 2011
THE LAW Given the similarity of the applications, as regards both fact and law, the Court deems it appropriate to join them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD001963705
13 octobre 2009
Kanar, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614JUD000061912
14 juin 2016
It shared the conclusions of the lower court as to the legal assessment of the facts of the case. 25.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0115DEC003284296
15 janvier 1998
the observations in reply submitted by the applicant on 10 March 1997;         Having deliberated;         Decides as follows:   THE FACTS
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD004671206
24 juillet 2012
  28949/03, §§ 61-62, 17   July 2007; Kania and Kittel v.   Poland , no. 35105/04, § 43, 21 June 2011). 51.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD002250802
17 juillet 2007
his right to a fair trial.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923JUD000719920
23 septembre 2025
    In the light of the foregoing, the Court has not found any fact or argument in the present applications capable of persuading it to depart from its conclusions in Mehmet Çiftci and Osman
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC003133904
15 novembre 2011
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as   follows. 1.     The background 1.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904JUD002081512
4 septembre 2018
EN FAIT I.     LES CIRCONSTANCES DE L’ESPÈCE 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206JUD005017109
6 décembre 2016
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1982 and lives in Şırnak. 6.
Page 28 sur 30
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.