CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
3ème chambre (formation à 5)
DCA_22BX01539_20221213
13 décembre 2022
Procédure devant la cour : Par une requête enregistrée le 2 juin 2022, Mme B G, représentée par Me Haas, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du tribunal administratif de Bordeaux du 31 mars
4ème chambre
DTA_2205800_20230202
2 février 2023
de l'Etat le versement à Me Haas de la somme globale de 1 500 euros.
DTA_2203819_20230504
4 mai 2023
A F, représenté par Me Émilie Haas, demande au tribunal dans le dernier état de ses écritures : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 22 juillet 2022 par lequel la préfète de la Gironde lui a refusé la délivrance
CASELAW;REPORTS;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0405REP001994692
5 avril 1995
19946/92     Emile Haas     contre     France     RAPPORT DE LA COMMISSION     (adopté le 5 avril 1995)     TABLE DES MATIERES    
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CR02729
21 novembre 2017
Émile X... ; que si M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC004214498
23 octobre 2003
By a letter dated 27 August 2001 the applicants’ representatives informed the Court that the applicant Zahide Emirler had died on 28 July 1998 and that her heirs Aliye Aslan, Celal   Emirler and Yahya
9ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2023:462344.20230220
20 février 2023
A demande au Conseil d'Etat : 1°) d'annuler l'ordonnance du 10 décembre 2021 ; 2°) de mettre à la charge de l'Etat la somme de 3 000 euros à verser à Me Thomas Haas, son avocat, au titre des articles L
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2967620-3267581
16 décembre 2009
The youngest of their six children, Emine, was born in 1990.
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO00553
9 octobre 2024
Le 27 novembre 2018, la CAPSSA a souscrit à 8 000 obligations d'une valeur nominale de 1 000 euros émises par la société Ha à l'occasion des emprunts obligataires et est devenue créancière obligataire
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250079
14 avril 2026
6 of the Convention, the applicants complain, in particular, that the domestic courts’ decisions were not adequately reasoned, that their convictions were based on self-incriminating statements they had
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD003670512
12 janvier 2017
My daughter said that she had these emails at her disposal ...
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13633
12 avril 2022
As regards counts 1 and 2 the Supreme Court had found unanimously that the applicant had provided guidance as well as procured medications, by specific acts, for A and B, in the knowledge that they had
Juge des référés
CETAT:CETATEXT000019989707
12 décembre 2008
d'entrée en France a rejeté leur recours contre la décision implicite du consul général de France à Libreville (Gabon) refusant la délivrance de visas de long séjour pour leurs enfants Kevinn Dharcy C, Emilie
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0719JUD004007498
19 juillet 2007
Emin Yıldırım had accepted his apology without ever claiming that he had been beaten.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14321
16 mai 2024
The applicant knew that the expert had performed all necessary tasks but had not removed the seals. He had also sent the judge an email at 3.18   p.m., which had gone unanswered.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC006195316
6 octobre 2022
    According to the Government, the District Court had no record of any email sent on 6 October 2011 from a computer at the applicant’s lawyer’s firm to [email protected] , nor did it send
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108JUD002020507
8 novembre 2011
In the car Mr V.M. told Mr I.G. that during his detention in Khatuni he had seen Said-Emin Sambiyev twice. Said-Emin Sambiyev had been beaten up and could barely speak.
ECLI:CEDH:001-195097
12 juillet 2019
Within the framework of the investigation, the political party had access to some emails that the applicant (also a member of the political party) had exchanged – using his personal email account – with
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD007904012
13 janvier 2015
In particular, the court observed in point 10.1 that the committee had concluded that the infringements committed by the applicant were demonstrated by the fact that he had sent the email and had carried
ECLI:CEDH:002-13390
7 septembre 2021
Law – Article 8: (a)     Applicability – The present case concerned emails that the applicant had exchanged with male correspondents on a casual dating site.
Page 3 sur 113
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.