GRIEFS Les requérants se plaignent de ce que Kadir Demir est décédé suite à des coups et sévices que les policiers, les gendarmes et les gardiens lui auraient infligés lors des événements survenus à la

  The applicant states that news stands have been attacked for selling the Özgür Gündem:        - On 16 November 1992, the news stand of Kadir Saka was subject  &#xa0

  As regards the alleged arson attack on Kadir Saka's news stand on 16 November 1992, the report of the Ministry of the Interior (para. 50 above) discloses that Kadir Saka was attacked by Hizbullah

04/2009 Recep KUŞ 21/10/1971 Malatya   Ahmet DİLEKÇİ 30/03/1964 Isparta   Erol KOZANOĞLU 01/01/1968 Ankara   Ali KORKMAZ 01/01/1971 Denizli   Ali KOCAMAN 18/02/1964 Kütahya   Kadir

xa0;   On 18 January 2008 the applicants wrote to the Federal Court drawing its attention to the opinion delivered on 16   January 2008 by the Advocate General in the case of Yassin Abdullah Kadi

Türkiye 24/10/2016 Ahmet KİRİŞ 16/02/1965 Ankara Kadir ÖZTÜRK (not lawyer) 100,000 3,000 Legal services agreement 128 2,000 4. 66373/16 Mermerci v.

Evelyne ALLAIS, conseiller, toutes deux magistrats rapporteurs (sans opposition des parties dûment avisées) qui en ont rendu compte à la Cour dans leur délibéré, assistées pendant les débats de Leïla KASMI

Türkiye 21/01/2022 İrfan ÇETİN 1977 Konya Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 141. 12766/22 Karataş v. Türkiye 07/03/2022 Mustafa KARATAŞ 1983 Istanbul Turkish Ahmet ÇİFTÇİ 142. 12926/22 Karaaslan v.

Türkiye 20/09/2022 Cengiz AKMAN 1976 Samsun Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 70. 47775/22 Özlü v. Türkiye 04/10/2022 Himmet ÖZLÜ 1979 Kütahya Turkish Havva ÖZLÜ 71. 47788/22 Köleoğlu v.

Türkiye 07/02/2020 Devlet ÇINGI 1974 Kırşehir Kadir ÖZTÜRK Failure/delay in examining requests for release/objection during post-conviction detention   14971/20 Yirik v.

Türkiye 14/09/2022 Hilal ASAM 1976 Kütahya Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 105. 46516/22 Tuncer v. Türkiye 19/09/2022 Ayşen TUNCER 1986 Denizli Turkish Süleyman ÖZGÜN 106. 46591/22 Bilge v.

selon la législation nationale, non seulement inaliénable mais aussi imprescriptible, l’écoulement d’un laps de temps, aussi long soit-il, ne peut avoir aucune conséquence juridique en droit interne ( Kadir

Türkiye 25/05/2022 Kadir ÇELİK 1986 Osmaniye Turkish Sinan TUMLUKOLÇU 169. 28550/22 Özcan v. Türkiye 01/06/2022 Yusuf ÖZCAN 1983 Kahramanmaraş Turkish Pınar ÖZCAN 170. 28557/22 Koyuncu v.

            79622/12 06/09/2012 Kadir KUŞ 01/01/1971 Wien Ömer Birol ERDİM 19 Mayıs Cadastral Court E: 2011/2.

criminal group 8,750   17226/20 24/03/2020 David Romanovich DAVITASHVILI 1973 Kirovskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 08/09/2020   7,500   18419/20 27/03/2020 Kadir

Se référant à l’arrêt Kadi ķis c.

Türkiye 28/01/2021 Ahmet TOPAL 1973 Malatya Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK 15. 38708/21 Bacak v. Türkiye 29/06/2021 Yasin BACAK 1988 Konya Turkish   16. 49294/21 Gökçelik v.

Türkiye 21/06/2024 Alparslan CANÖZ 1975 Ankara Turkish Kadir ÖZTÜRK Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention   21824/24 Esen v.

Türkiye 05/01/2023 Kadir ÇİKRIKCİ 1977 Istanbul Turkish Arzu BEYAZIT Lack of reasonable suspicion Length of pre-trial detention Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during

    On 20 July 1995 a forensic expert examined Ahmet Güven, Kadri Sönmez, Metin Göktepe, Neslihan Göktepe, İzzettin Koç, Kadir Issı, Mehmet Kışanak, Rıdvan Karatay, Ali Kemal Yıldız and Ms Emsihan