CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:1208JUD000798477
8 décembre 1983
Squillante , Section President       at the Consiglio di Stato, Head of the Diplomatic Legal       Service at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,   Agent ,   Mr.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-242689
10 mars 2025
Cesare ITA 1971 78 ALATI Mariella ITA 1956 79 ALBA Margherita ITA 1962 80 ALBAN Marzia ITA 1974 81 ALBANESE Giuseppina ITA 1964 82 ALBANESE Maria Cristina ITA 1978 83 ALBANO Antonio ITA 1952 84 ALBANO Consiglia
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530JUD002463894
30 mai 2000
    In its judgment no. 874 of 1996, the Consiglio di Stato stated that there was no constructive expropriation where resolutions of the authorities and an expedited possession order had been
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0109JUD003812722
9 janvier 2025
    Nevertheless, their employment was periodically extended until 18   January 2016 when the Parliament ( Consiglio Grande e Generale ), by decision no. 8 of 18 January 2016, acknowledged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0910JUD005975115
10 septembre 2020
    In the instant case, the Court observes that the final domestic decision was the judgment of the Consiglio di Stato .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0916JUD002956995
16 septembre 1999
    The applicant also applied – unsuccessfully – to the National Council of the Judiciary ( Consiglio superiore della magistratura ). relevant domestic law 47.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0219JUD001496789
19 février 1998
    In a judgment (no. 476) of 21 November 1991 the Council of Administrative Law for Sicily ( Consiglio di Giustizia amministrativa per la Regione siciliana – which in Sicily replaces the Supreme
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0402JUD002585109
2 avril 2013
    By a decree of 2 July 2008 the Supreme Administrative Court ( Consiglio di Stato ) rejected her request for an interim measure. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0222JUD001295487
22 février 1994
  In its opinion no. 1489/86 of 18 November 1986 the Consiglio di Stato stated that "although confiscation by definition enables the State to acquire the item of property in question ..., it does
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1214JUD000139803
14 décembre 2006
    Article 31 of Royal Decree no. 1024 of 26 June 1924 provides: “No appeal to the Consiglio di Stato , sitting in its judicial capacity, shall lie against acts or decisions of the government
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1024JUD003770397
24 octobre 2002
    On 20 November 1996 the Consiglio di Stato expressed the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed because the instant case did not involve terrorist acts or acts of a mafia-type criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0725JUD002495494
25 juillet 2000
    On 2 August 1993 the second applicant asked the appellate judge to request a ruling from the General Grand Council ( Consiglio Grande e Generale ) as to whether the absence of a public hearing
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC000231410
10 septembre 2013
System for Asylum Seekers and Refugees”), the Department responsible for Dublin requests at the Italian Ministry of the Interior ( Ministero dell’Interno ) and to the Italian Council for Refugees ( Consiglio
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD001811402
18 octobre 2006
He received a letter entitled “Notice to appear in appeal proceedings before the court sitting in private” ( decreto di citazione per il giudizio di appello davanti la Corte in camera di consiglio ), the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0219JUD001439624
19 février 2026
    ln the relevant period, the composition of the Judicial Council in plenary session ( Consiglio Giudiziario Plenario , hereinafter “CGP”) was governed by Qualified Law no. 145/2003, and subsequent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0108DEC005627100
8 janvier 2004
(First Section) of 31 March 1992, no. 467 and of 9 June 1999, no. 2171, as well as the decision of the Consiglio di Stato (Fourth Section) of 6 April 2000, no. 1996).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003929409
30 juin 2015
In September 2001 he sent a letter to the Italian National Legal Service Commission (Consiglio Superiore della Magistratura – the “CSM”) in which he complained about the conduct of a judge, X, at the Lucca
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-179757
7 décembre 2017
xa0;   DH(99)582 47774/99 CONTI 27/02/2001 27/05/2001   26827/95 CONTI     DH(96)663 39888/98 COPPOLA     DH(99)651 38128/97 CORALLUZZO     DH(99)281 44385/98 CORNAGLIA
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179758
Pôle 5 - Chambre 7
67e6402375737a1debd7e88e
27 mars 2025
l'espèce, a pour effet de consolider des cloisonnements de caractère national, entravant l'interpénétration économique voulue par le TFUE (Cour de justice de l'Union (ci-après « CJUE »), 18 juillet 2013, Consiglio
Page 38 sur 38
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.