2023 **** N° de MINUTE : 23/406 N° RG 21/04547 - N° Portalis DBVT-V-B7F-TZ2U Jugement (N° 21/00143) rendu le 27 Juillet 2021 par le Juge des contentieux de la protection d'Avesnes-sur-Helpe

Arrest van het Hof (Eerste kamer) van 11 juli 1979.#Jean-Louis Pennartz tegen Caisse primaire d'assurance maladie des Alpes-Maritimes.

The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4 (right to liberty and security) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

He further complained, relying on Article 6 § 1, about the length of the criminal proceedings against him, which had lasted five years, ten months and ten days.

  Summary of the facts   The case concerned Mr Kart’s complaint that he could not defend his name in criminal proceedings against him because, as a member of parliament (MP), he was subject to

The Chamber held by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article   10 of the Convention.

He alleges that he was not summoned to the hearing before the Court of Cassation and was thus prevented from replying to the Advocate-General’s submissions.

He had no contact with other prisoners or prison warders and was authorised to leave his cell only for a two-hour daily walk.

[N] [V], décédé le [Date décès 1] 1997 INTERVENANT VOLONTAIRE demeurant [Adresse 16] représenté par Me Jean Michel SIDER, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE constitué aux lieu et place de la

Bernard Y... ... 59330 NEUF MESNIL Représentant : Me Marcel DURUT (avocat au barreau d'AVESNES SUR HELPE) substitué par Me LAFORCE, avoué, M.

D'APPEL DE DOUAI CHAMBRE 7 SECTION 2 ARRÊT DU 26/ 05/ 2011 *** No MINUTE : No RG : 10/ 03231 Jugement (No 07/ 01038) rendu le 01 Avril 2010 par le Juge aux affaires familiales d'AVESNES SUR HELPE

the report drawn up on 30 November 1994 by the European Commission of Human Rights, in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention, relating to the application lodged on 1 August 1991 by Mr   Jean-Louis

The département , regional and national councils of the ordre des médecins refused her applications.

regard to the report drawn up on 26 June 1996, by the European Commission of Human Rights in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 1st June 1994 by Mr   Jean

who was on leave of absence;   Recalling that the case was brought before the Court by the Government of France on 11 July 1997;   Whereas in its judgment of 29 July 1998 the Court: -   held

(JEAN), CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE LA REUNION, EN DATE DU 28 AVRIL 1966, QUI, POUR VIOLENCES A ENFANT DE MOINS DE QUINZE ANS, LES A CONDAMNES, LE PREMIER A QUATRE MOIS DE PRISON AVEC SURSIS,

B C, représenté par Me Held-Sutter, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 18 septembre 2023 par laquelle la caisse d'allocations familiales du Cher lui a notifié un avertissement, un trop-perçu

On 5 November 1999 the court held that her detention had been justified on the ground that she was deranged, as had been evidenced by, among other things, the hospital staff’s record that she had stayed

The court considered, in particular, that in view of her very young age and her close relationship with her mother, Charlotte’s return to the US would place her in an intolerable situation because of her

He relied on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair hearing).