Serghides,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Dmitry Dedov,   María Elósegui,   Erik Wennerström,   Lorraine Schembri Orland, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Alena Poláčková, President,   Dmitry Dedov,   Gilberto Felici, judges, and Stephen Phillips

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 March 2019, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  With regard to decisions concerning civil rights only in their effects the Court found that it sufficed under Article 6 para. 1 if a tribunal undertook a mere subsequent control of the decision.

least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements laid down in domestic law, but not that recourse should be had to remedies which are inadequate or ineffective (see, mutatis mutandis, Merger

De Meyer ,   Mr   R. Pekkanen ,   Mr   J. Makarczyk ,   Mr   D. Gotchev ,   Mr   P. Jambrek , and also of Mr H. Petzold , Registrar , and Mr P.J.

    The Court reiterates that the mere existence of conflicting decisions, in itself, cannot be considered contrary to the Convention (see Santos Pinto v.

The mere fact that in some instances that decision had relied on Italian jurisprudence only served to further the reasoning in relation to the arguments raised.

This guarantee applies whatever the grounds for detention and the mere absence of any proceedings satisfying Article 5 § 4 of the Convention can result in a finding of violation (see De Wilde, Ooms and

held that proceedings in which the right to continue to exercise a profession is at stake give rise to “ contestations” (disputes) over civil rights within the meaning of Article 6 § 1   (see Philis

The “religious” ceremony before an imam appointed by the Directorate is a mere formality which entails little solemnity. The civil marriage takes precedence over the religious marriage. III.

en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a refusé d'annuler le réquisitoire supplétif du 17 avril 2000 et la procédure subséquente ; " aux motifs que le 22 mars 2000, les deux experts maritimes Hervé H... et Philippe

Cher, du Morbihan, du Pas de Calais, - La CAISSE NATIONALE DE L'ASSURANCE MALADIE DES TRAVAILLEURS SALARIES, - Les CAISSES PRIMAIRES D'ASSURANCE MALADIE : d'Angers, de Boulogne sur Mer