On 27 June 2004 the applicant gave himself up and was remanded in detention.

On 14 June 2013 SIZO officials informed the police authorities that the applicant’s state of health is aggravating and might lead to his death (a copy of the letter attached to the request).

Jung doit être rejetée selon la procédure prévue par l'article L. 522-3 du code de justice administrative, y compris les conclusions aux fins d'injonction et celles présentées au titre de l'article L.

prisons in St Petersburg: (a)     between 21 December 2011 and 25 January 2012 he was detained in IZ-47/6 in Gorelovo, the Leningrad Region; (b)     between 24 January 2012 and 6 June

On 6 June 2015 she delivered an acquittal decision.

On 1 June 2005 the Town Court decided to remand the applicant in custody because he did not appear at the hearing without good cause.

On 13 June 2003 the Edirne Public Prosecutor suspended the applicant’s detention for one year and ordered his release.

The applicant applied for asylum in the Netherlands on 8 June 2009.

1956 Kidney cancer (IV stage), spreading; first degree disability No adequate and timely diagnostic tests and medical treatment; painkillers prescribed are ineffective IK-24 Azanka Sverdlovsk Region 30 June

He lodged a further application with the assize court on 4 June 1996, but it was dismissed on 11 June.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 2 juin 2022, la société à responsabilité limitée La Bastide de June représentée par Me Sollberger, demande au tribunal : 1°) de prononcer la

Poland , no. 19776/04, § 66, 14 June 2011)?

Germany (no 26771/03), judgment of 12 June 2008.   Ichtigiaroglou v. Greece (no 12045/06), judgment of 19 June 2008. Sossoadouno v. Greece (no 29845/06), judgment of 31 July 2008.

    The applicant also submitted that on 29 June 2005 there were nine detainees in the cell.

    On 7 June 1998 the court acceded to the applicant’s request.

    Between 5 June 2001 and 23 June 2010 the proceedings were again analysed by the first-instance court to which they were remitted twice.

Municipal Court in Novi Pazar of 23 June 2006 3. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar of 23 June 2006 1. Municipal Court in Novi Pazar of 27 December 2005 2.

of the applications she had made in that regard on 4 and 5 June, as well as twice on 13 June 2008.

On 21 June 2006 the District Court separated one of the counts against one of the applicant's co-accused for examination in separate proceedings. On 27 June 2006 the District Court rejected A.'

On 14 June and 27 June 2022 respectively, the applicants requested the Court to indicate interim measures under Rule 39 of the Rules of the Court.