CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

48 781 résultats pour « Hellier »

TousCC
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-216643

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2022

4 mars 2022

She regularly visited them in the Netherlands on temporary visas and they regularly visit her in India to help her organise her daily life.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68158-68626

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2000

30 novembre 2000

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68111-68579

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2000

25 janvier 2000

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4894

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2003

6 mai 2003

:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 53 May 2003 P4 Radio Hele

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68075-68543

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1999

1 juillet 1999

    After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1366800-1426839

Admin. suprême

16 juin 2005

16 juin 2005

In a judgment of 27 January 2005 (see press release no. 038), the Court held by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68146-68614

Admin. suprême

5 octobre 2000

5 octobre 2000

  After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0506DEC002974904

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2008

6 mai 2008

On 22 June 1999 an oral hearing was held, at which the applicant’s counsel was present.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2016798-2144455

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

5 juin 2007

The Court thus held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 3.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1303269-1362033

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2005

31 mars 2005

The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 13 in this respect.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1031257-1072814

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2004

24 juin 2004

It accordingly held that there had been no violation of Article 9 of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1612163-1696391

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2006

21 mars 2006

It therefore held that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1561382-1641308

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2006

24 janvier 2006

It held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1648712-1732070

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2006

20 avril 2006

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-553811-555759

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2002

21 mai 2002

It further held that it was not necessary to examine the subsidiary complaints in the Hodoş case.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1551347-1629326

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2006

12 janvier 2006

Accordingly, it held that there had been no violation of Article 2 on that account.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2141598-2286596

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2007

16 octobre 2007

The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1019DEC003141696

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 1998

19 octobre 1998

  The sun rises above the Hele Stone on the date of the summer solstice.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1154543-1202446

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2004

7 octobre 2004

The Court further held unanimously that the remainder of the application was inadmissible. (The judgment is available only in English.)   Vatan v.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1037558-1077329

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2004

29 juin 2004

Consequently, the Court held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Convention in that regard.

Source officielle

Page 47 sur 2440

← PrécédentSuivant →