AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216643
4 mars 2022
4 mars 2022
She regularly visited them in the Netherlands on temporary visas and they regularly visit her in India to help her organise her daily life.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68158-68626
30 novembre 2000
30 novembre 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68111-68579
25 janvier 2000
25 janvier 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4894
6 mai 2003
6 mai 2003
:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 53 May 2003 P4 Radio Hele
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68075-68543
1 juillet 1999
1 juillet 1999
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1366800-1426839
16 juin 2005
16 juin 2005
In a judgment of 27 January 2005 (see press release no. 038), the Court held by four votes to three that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68146-68614
5 octobre 2000
5 octobre 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0506DEC002974904
6 mai 2008
6 mai 2008
On 22 June 1999 an oral hearing was held, at which the applicant’s counsel was present.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2016798-2144455
5 juin 2007
5 juin 2007
The Court thus held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 3.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1303269-1362033
31 mars 2005
31 mars 2005
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been no violation of Article 13 in this respect.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1031257-1072814
24 juin 2004
24 juin 2004
It accordingly held that there had been no violation of Article 9 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1612163-1696391
21 mars 2006
21 mars 2006
It therefore held that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1561382-1641308
24 janvier 2006
24 janvier 2006
It held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 3.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1648712-1732070
20 avril 2006
20 avril 2006
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-553811-555759
21 mai 2002
21 mai 2002
It further held that it was not necessary to examine the subsidiary complaints in the Hodoş case.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1551347-1629326
12 janvier 2006
12 janvier 2006
Accordingly, it held that there had been no violation of Article 2 on that account.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2141598-2286596
16 octobre 2007
16 octobre 2007
The Court therefore held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1019DEC003141696
19 octobre 1998
19 octobre 1998
The sun rises above the Hele Stone on the date of the summer solstice.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1154543-1202446
7 octobre 2004
7 octobre 2004
The Court further held unanimously that the remainder of the application was inadmissible. (The judgment is available only in English.) Vatan v.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1037558-1077329
29 juin 2004
29 juin 2004
Consequently, the Court held unanimously in both cases that there had been a violation of Convention in that regard.
Source officiellePage 47 sur 2440