no. 31725/04) against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a   Romanian national, Mr Aurel

février 2025, Madame Laurence SINQUIN, présidente ayant été entendu en son rapport, devant la cour composée de : Madame Laurence SINQUIN, Présidente, Mme Florence SCHARRE, Conseillère, Madame Aurélie

LEVALLOIS PERRET représenté par Me Florence BONA, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R100 INTIMEES 5o - SNC SOCIETE EUROBAR 2 Place de la Défense 92053 PARIS LA DEFENSE représentée par Me Aurélie

comparant en personne, assisté de Me Florence BONA, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R100 INTIMEES 3o- SNC SOCIETE EUROBAR 2 place de la Défense 92053 PARIS LA DEFENSE représentée par Me Aurélie

Neither B. nor the applicant was aware of the aural surveillance equipment which had been installed by the police. 10.

[BD] [CT] [Adresse 52] Représentant (s) : Maître GILLOT Aurélie Maître GRENIER Christelle Défendeur (s) : M.

BNP PARIBAS [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] Représentée par Me Aurélie LESTRADE de la SELARL DECKER, avocat postulant au barreau de TOULOUSE et par Me Silvia LEPEL de l'AARPI BCTG AVOCATS, avocat plaidant

comparant en personne, assisté de Me Florence BONA, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : R100, INTIMEES 14o- SNC SOCIETE EUROBAR 2 Place de la Défense 92053 PARIS LA DEFENSE représentée par Me Aurélie

    The applicants are two Romanian nationals, Mr Liviu Aurel Man and   Ms Milena Man (“the first and second applicants”), as well as three   Romanian companies, S.C.

03) against the Republic of Moldova lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a Moldovan national, Mr Aurel

32.86pt; text-align:left; padding-left:2.84pt; font-family:Arial } .sC459A3A9 { margin-left:35.7pt; text-align:left; font-family:Arial }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 63945/09 Aurel

legislation (specifically, the 1997 Act) to designate covert operatives was “agents under cover” (see paragraph 74 (h) and 75 below), whereas the term “agents on cover” could be found at the statutory level

The Moscow expert commission insisted that the etiological cause of the pneumonia was bacterium of staphylococcus aureus.

presence of a remand prison guard in a specially adapted room, the detainees and their visitor(s) being separated by a dividing wall preventing the handing over of any item but not preventing visual and aural

    On 31 December 2008 the applicant, who was still in the prison hospital at that time, was diagnosed with staphylococcus aureus , and the relevant antibiotic therapy was begun immediately

the experts confirmed that there had been no objective evidence of the applicants’ son’s intoxication with petrochemicals, finding that the etiological cause of the pneumonia had been staphylococcus aureus