En 2009, le tribunal du district Loutouhyne (région de Louhansk de l’Ukraine) prononça le divorce du requérant.

Philippe Y..., demeurant ..., bâtiment J, 34000 Montpellier, 2°/ de M. Robert X..., demeurant ..., 3°/ de M. Paul C..., demeurant ..., 4°/ de M. Gérard Z..., demeurant ..., 5°/ de M.

, Konotop District Court 480            27426/08 YARMOSHCHUK MYKOLA ANATOLIYOVYCH (1950) 26 May 2008 18 August 2004, Kremenets District Court 1,020  &#

    In March 2003 the prosecutor referred the criminal case to the Industrialnyy District Court of Barnaul (“the District Court”) for trial. 7.

District Court 1,455 - 11. 56454/07 YAVDOKHIN , Viktor Grigoryevich, 1956 1 December 2007 5 December 2005, Dzerzhynskyy District Court of Kryvyy Rig 750 - 12. 12020/08 SAVCHUK , Lidiya Stepanivna, 1922

On 5 September 2002 the District Court allowed the applicant’s claims in full.

14/07/1952 Donetsk 1) Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 10/02/1995   2) Kalininskyy District Court of Donetsk, 07/10/2004 1) Ratione personae and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies &

On 18 May 2006 the Zamostyanskiy District Court found in the applicant’s favour in part but held that the applicant could not be reinstated since the State Committee had been dissolved in 2005.

Zupančič, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Aleš Pejchal, judges,   Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar .

M. were denied access to the criminal file by the Ljubljana District Public Prosecutor’s Office.

On the latter date the Ljubljana District Court issued its decision, dismissing the applicant’s claim. The applicant appealed.

In March 2000 the applicants lodged a claim with the Leninskyy District Court of Kirovograd (“the District Court”) against Mr P., Mr G. and the local authorities, claiming their title to a part of the

La Cour relève aussi que le tribunal du district Sevski ne s’est pas prononcé formellement sur cette question, et le tribunal du district Sovetski et la cour régionale de Briansk ont au début accepté le

On 24 January 2001 the applicant instituted proceedings before the Maribor District Court. On 18 February 2003 the first-instance judgment was rendered. An appeal was lodged.

  On 13 October 1995 the judgment of the Lisbon District Court was recognised as final in Romania. The former King Mihai of Romania lodged two unsuccessful appeals against that decision.

    In the period prior to 10 October 2002 the Darnitsky District Court of Kyiv (the district court) remitted the case twice for additional pre-trial investigation. 9.

On the same date the Ljubljana District Court partially upheld and partially dismissed the applicant’s claim. All parties appealed.

    On 7 December 2001 the Berlin Regional Court altered the district court’s decision on appeal.

In a judgment of 21 July 1998 the Plovdiv District Court dismissed the action. On 18 August 1998 the plaintiffs appealed.

Jean-Philippe Lacombe, est un ressortissant français né en 1968 et résidant à Nice.