CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830JUD004044806
30 août 2016
{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sCB9E0544 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:left } .sB9D5CABB { width:28.35pt; display:inline-block } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt
Page 5 sur 9
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0113JUD003449197
13 janvier 2005
{ margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:8.8pt; font-size:10pt } .s451A1BF5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .sE8EB5753 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1962:0305DEC000100861
5 mars 1962
.sDD6737AE { font-size:11pt } .s211D6B00 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; line-height:normal; widows:0; orphans:0; font-size:8.5pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } EN FAIT Considérant que
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-187012
21 septembre 2018
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s26DCBAD8 { margin-top:3pt; margin-left:42.55pt; margin-bottom:3pt; font-size:11pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s40F41F73 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0523JUD000054213
23 mai 2019
; font-size:11pt } .s4ACA9207 { page-break-before:always; clear:both; mso-break-type:section-break } .s9793A85B { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom
comm
613723f7cd58014677410891
5 février 2002
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Soules Caf, société anonyme, dont le siège
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD002183103
13 octobre 2009
a way as to restore calm.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68368-68836
10 juillet 2001
They relied on Articles 2 (right to life), 3, 5 (right to liberty and security), 6, 8 (right to respect for family life), 13 (right to an effective remedy), 14 and 18 (limitation on use of restrictions
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234580
25 juin 2024
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s10950C61 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align
ECLI:CEDH:001-238001
12 novembre 2024
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC004043706
28 juin 2016
:italic } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s701081D1 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt; text-align:left } .sD3B63DAD { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; page-break-inside
DELIBERE REFERE
6a046b72cdc6046d4795f05f
11 mai 2026
* DEBOUTER la société TERRE' HAPPY SOUL du surplus de ses demandes.
soc
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:SO01365
6 juillet 2016
accessoires aux dépens ; Vu l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, condamne la société Sorgues accessoires à payer à M.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1238279-1289141
Special instructions had been issued before their intervention on the type and level of force to be used so as to keep it to a minimum.
ECLI:CEDH:001-243485
19 mai 2025
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s379BC09C { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:right } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } .s5E1364CA { margin-top
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0603DEC005962308
3 juin 2010
had been provided to their authorities.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008DEC005610212
8 octobre 2013
Furthermore, he submitted a statement of the applicant’s brother, A.A., according to which the police in Sorgun and Antalya had tortured him to extract a confession.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0924JUD006006516
24 septembre 2024
a general reference to Article 100 of the CCP and the potential sentence, as well as to “the evidence in the file”.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0618DEC005566118
18 juin 2024
{ margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:14pt; text-align:center; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s83BE5C30 { font-family:Arial; font-size:8pt; vertical-align:super } .s10950C61 { margin-top
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC002020107
3 mai 2011
.s800EAC49 { font-size:12pt } .s523616E0 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center; font-size:14pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s8229ABDD { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align