B A, représenté par Me Yigit, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision implicite par laquelle le ministre de l'intérieur a rejeté son recours formé contre la décision en date du 28 juillet 2020

Türkiye 15/03/2022 Baykan EBRET 1976 Konya Turkish Güliz Rabia TEKİN 145. 22954/22 Yiğit v. Türkiye 05/05/2022 Mehmet YİĞİT 1982 Antalya Turkish Nergis YİĞİT 146. 22955/22 Yaman v.

  En l’affaire Şerife Yiğit c.

01/1973 Edirne Fazıl Ahmet TAMER   26229/07 05/06/2007 Süleyman TATAR 02/04/1970 Ankara Fazıl Ahmet TAMER             41318/07 09/08/2007 Kemal YİĞİT

129.08pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }     SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 21184/14 Kemal YİĞİT

text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 99 July 2007 Mehmet and Suna Yiğit

Case Date of the decision 33475/19 İsmail YİĞİT 14/09/2023 41253/19+ Tülay DELİBAŞ AND Durmuş İLHAN 31/08/2023 54762/13 Mustafa SEYMEN 14/09/2023   The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article

  50939/99, §§ 66 ‑ 78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v.   Turkey , no.   52658/99, §§   33 ‑ 39, 17   July 2007; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey , no.

Procédure devant la Cour : Par une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés le 1er mars 2022 et le 10 mai 2022, Mme C, représentée par Me Yigit, demande à la Cour : 1°) d'annuler le jugement n° 2108802

Gamze UĞUZ 01/01/1972 Istanbul Atiye Ülkü 101 Necibe Fisun ÜNAL 08/06/1951 Istanbul Atiye Ülkü 102 Namiktar URCU 17/12/1927 Antalya Atiye Ülkü 103 Yılmaz YALÇIN 22/04/1943 Antalya Atiye Ülkü 104 Mustafa YİĞİT

  12 thereto (see, mutatis mutandis , Şerife Yiğit v. Turkey [GC], no.   3976/05, § 79, 2   November 2010)?   3.

    Le droit et la pratique internes pertinents sont mentionnés dans les arrêts Mehmet et Suna Yiğit c. Turquie (n o 52658/99, §§ 19-22, 17 juillet 2007), et Serin c.

} .s172EF8F1 { width:208.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }       SECOND SECTION               CASE OF YİGİN

Ali Yiğit et M.

Yiğit Turhan Oyal was infected with HIV at a very young age because of the blood given by the the Kızılay.

  24870/06 İsmail YİĞİT against Turkey   The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 10   April 2018 as a Committee composed of:   Paul Lemmens, President,  

center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt }     DEUXIÈME SECTION DÉCISION Requête n o 54619/11 Yılmaz YİĞİT

    Has there been a violation of Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 8 or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Şerife Yiğit v.

Turquie (n o 28171/02) Hüseyin Yiğit c. Turquie (n o 28183/02) Kendirci c. Turquie (n o 28190/02) Mehmet Yiğit c.