B et la société FYP SYSTEMES, représentés par Me Delilaj, demandent au juge des référés, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article L. 521-2 du code de justice administrative : 1°) à titre principal

Procédure devant la cour : Par une requête, enregistrée le 7 août 2025, Mme B..., représentée par Me Delilaj, demande à la cour : 1°) d’annuler ce jugement du 4 juillet 2025 du tribunal administratif

A dans un délai de deux mois à compter de la notification de ce jugement et a condamné l'État à verser à Me Delilaj la somme de 1 000 euros en application des dispositions du deuxième alinéa de l'article

A, représenté par Me Delilaj, demande à la cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du magistrat désigné du tribunal administratif de Rennes du 18 septembre 2023 ; 2°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 11 septembre 2023

B A, représenté par Me Delilaj, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement de l'article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative, la suspension de l'exécution de l'arrêté du 16

  The Court held that the denial of the registration for a period of over two years was a disproportionate interference with the applicant’s Article 8 rights and thus a violation of Article 8 was

Law : Article 6 § 1 – It is clear that the repeated denials by the prosecution of the existence of undisclosed relevant material and the failure to inform the trial judge of the true position were not

As to whether the refusal of leave to appeal was arbitrary, unfair or a denial of the right of access to court, taking into account the State’s margin of appreciation, the requirements of the consolidated

      FOURTH SECTION Applications nos. 75865/11 and 10090/16 CENTRE FOR DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW against Ukraine SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASES The applications concern an alleged denial

The court rulings concerning the two applicants had been arbitrary and therefore amounted to a “denial of justice”. Conclusion : violation (unanimously).

In 2007 the Supreme Court held that the denial of medical treatment combined with the conditions of detention, which had aggravated the applicant’s medical condition, had amounted to inhuman treatment

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the denial of access to the Supreme Court because of the legal aid lawyer’s refusal to lodge a cassation appeal (see Siałkowska

Netherlands - 25424/05 Decision 27.5.2008 [Section III] Article 3 Expulsion Risk of ill-treatment in case of expulsion to Algeria of a terrorist suspect: admissible   Article 13 Effective remedy Denial

Denial of access for 48 hours where the defence might be irretrievably prejudiced was incompatible with rights of accused. Conclusion : violation (twelve votes to seven). II.

While the legislation made this type of responsibility contingent on a finding that there had been a denial of justice or gross negligence, developments in the case-law had led the domestic courts to interpret

satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2025)1041 );   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to a similar violation, established on account of the denial

just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2024)1091 );   Recalling that the question of general measures required in response to a similar violation, established on account of denial

Moulinier, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Deniaux, représentant la commune de Penmarc'h. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.