CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 703 résultats pour « Daniel RIGHI Me »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514DEC005745719

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2020

14 mai 2020

vertical-align:super; color:#000000 }   FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 57457/19 Tamás NÉMETH against Hungary and 9 other applications (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1121DEC000275424

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2024

21 novembre 2024

Tóth Máté Budapest   17/10/2024 10/07/2024 2,600     12305/24 18/04/2024 Imre HOCHSTEIN 1975   Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0919DEC003535223

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2024

19 septembre 2024

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0313DEC002224524

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2025

13 mars 2025

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1002DEC000401825

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2025

2 octobre 2025

Bálint Budapest Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of excessive length of criminal proceedings 06/08/2025 16/06/2025 3,900     7586/25 04/03/2025 Dániel ZAGYVA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0510DEC007629014

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2016

10 mai 2016

:8.54pt; display:inline-block } .s4936F720 { width:196.76pt; display:inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 76290/14 Daniel

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0430DEC004923319

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2020

30 avril 2020

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0914DEC004712822

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2023

14 septembre 2023

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0928DEC004959222

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2023

28 septembre 2023

2023 Sándor BALOGH 1965 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   14/07/2023 19/06/2023 3,900     10991/23 24/02/2023 Gábor SCHALLI 1966 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest   17/07/2023 28/06/2023 3,900

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0625DEC002426518

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2020

25 juin 2020

It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and the Protocols thereto and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180606

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2018

14 janvier 2018

publication of two allegedly defamatory articles concerning the applicant in a newspaper and the failure to provide damages for the alleged infringement of the applicant’s reputation, as part of the right

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629DEC004013316

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2023

29 juin 2023

BABII against Romania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 29 June 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Tim Eicke , President ,   Branko Lubarda,   Ana Maria Guerra

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0314JUD005392822

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2024

14 mars 2024

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a   Committee composed of:   Gilberto Felici , President ,   Péter Paczolay,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-161475

Admin. suprême

24 février 2016

24 février 2016

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-218321

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2022

10 juin 2022

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-231047

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2024

30 janvier 2024

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-194761

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2019

10 juillet 2019

:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0313DEC000703407

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2012

13 mars 2012

solid #808080; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left:2.48pt; background-color:#e0e0e0 } .s63C62A4B { border-left:0.75pt solid #808080; border-bottom:0.75pt solid #808080; padding-right:2.48pt; padding-left

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC000266506

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top; background-color:#a0a0a0 } .sB30C44B0 { border-top-style:solid; border-top-width:0.75pt; border-right-style:solid; border-right-width

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169974

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2016

8 décembre 2016

font-size:9pt } .s24AC208E { border-right-style:solid; border-right-width:0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; border-bottom-style:solid; border-bottom-width:0.75pt; padding-right

Source officielle

Page 6 sur 86

← PrécédentSuivant →