CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0627JUD003339596
27 juin 2002
; font-size:10pt } .s9671CAED { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:14.2pt } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sEEE3CE35 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:20.15pt; margin-bottom
Page 6 sur 1109
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0831DEC005463308
31 août 2010
Les experts l'ayant informé de l'impossibilité de présenter les conclusions dans le délai initialement prévu, soit au mois de décembre 2002, le 16 mai 2003, le tribunal suspendit la procédure.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0701JUD001734304
1 juillet 2008
The journalist had contacted the author of the open letter and interviewed her.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000750809
15 décembre 2009
In a letter to the court dated 1 December 2008 the lawyer informed the court about his refusal to draw up a cassation appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103DEC003297505
3 novembre 2009
In a letter to the court dated 13 June 2005 the lawyer informed the court of his refusal to draw up a cassation appeal (filed with the court on 27 June 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1110DEC002301107
10 novembre 2009
In a letter to the court dated 17 October 2006 the lawyer informed the court that he had found no grounds on which to prepare a cassation appeal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323DEC001938705
23 mars 2010
Arial; font-style:italic } .s967D43C6 { margin-top:36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s7EE1C8F0 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left
cr
613726a9cd580146774277f4
26 juin 2007
Z... faisait devant les autres employés des remarques désobligeantes sur la lenteur du travail de Ramata A... et que ces reproches permanents, dits sur un ton agressif, étaient excessifs et injustifiés
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122867
25 juin 2013
:10pt } .s339C6B8E { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:28.35pt; margin-bottom:18pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s21F08A35 { margin-top:18pt; margin-left:36.6pt; margin-bottom:6pt
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003830197
23 mars 1999
:-0.1pt } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .sA047E36C { width:24.66pt; display:inline-block } .s5B366099 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; letter-spacing:-0.1pt } .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD005668716
29 juin 2021
:0pt; margin-left:0pt; padding-left:0pt } .sF5DC77FC { margin-left:2.81pt; margin-bottom:6pt; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; padding-left:1.99pt; font-weight:normal; font-style:italic
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1116JUD005367800
16 novembre 2004
} .s127C7598 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s81CCF55C
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1201DEC006730001
1 décembre 2009
In a letter dated 28 July 2000 Moldtelecom informed the applicant organisation that it had intervened at the request of the applicant organisation at 12.53 a.m. on 18 July 2000 and that at
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD003034310
24 juillet 2018
:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .sF7A86111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:7.1pt; font-size:10pt } .sF7876111 { margin-top:6pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0727JUD006323900
27 juillet 2010
:17pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:-17pt; text-align:justify } .sD66C1369 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:17.3pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .s60723A49 { margin-top:0pt; margin-left:39.7pt
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0129DEC004764309
29 janvier 2013
:12pt; text-indent:7.1pt; text-align:justify; font-size:10pt } .s13F94BE0 { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing:-0.3pt } .sFD4D42B6 { margin-top:12pt; margin-left:21.25pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-indent:
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC000249507
9 juin 2009
On 12 May 2009 the Court received a letter from the applicant and a signed declaration confirming the friendly settlement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0331JUD000642807
31 mars 2011
The applicant, relying on the decisions of courts in similar, according to her, defamation cases, also submitted that by her letter of 23 March 2005 she had simply informed the higher authorities about
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0726JUD004106205
26 juillet 2011
} .s804EF768 { margin-top:24pt; margin-left:29.2pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-indent:-17.6pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid } .s13F94BDE { font-family:Arial; letter-spacing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0519DEC002326308
19 mai 2009
More than ten years later, by a letter dated 10 January 2008, the customs authorities sent the applicant’s counsel a letter informing him of the results of their investigation.