CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
5ème et 6ème chambres réunies
ECLI:FR:CECHR:2025:494597.20250704
4 juillet 2025
faire droit à sa demande du 29 février 2024 tendant à ce qu'elle adresse une mise en demeure aux éditeurs de service de télévision et de radio France 2, France 3, France 4, France 5, France info, France Inter
Page 62 sur 1989
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0331DEC003290322
31 mars 2026
In view of the foregoing, the Court concludes that it is no longer justified to continue with the examination of the present application, within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0323JUD001531889
23 mars 1995
Jambrek (Article 43 in fine of the Convention and Rule 21 para. 4) (art. 43). 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC006068208
5 octobre 2010
On the same date he was formally charged with, inter alia , two counts of murder in the first degree. 3.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244040
5 juin 2025
domestic remedy in this regard, in violation of Article 13 of the Convention.
3ème - 8ème chambres réunies
CETAT:CETATEXT000037783322
7 décembre 2018
Sur le bien-fondé de l'arrêt en tant qu'il porte sur l'application des conventions fiscales bilatérales : En ce qui concerne la convention fiscale franco-belge : 3.
4ème Chambre
DTA_1903076_20221114
14 novembre 2022
Il soutient qu'il doit pouvoir bénéficier de l'application des commentaires administratifs publiés au Bulletin officiel des finances publiques sous les références BOI-INT-CVB-USA-10-20-20, notamment son
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1203DEC002374994
3 décembre 1996
of its patent application in the Netherlands was not yet final; that its application to the Finnish authorities was in any case different; that the Appeals Division had taken into account material submitted
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327JUD002523002
27 mars 2008
In their initial application, the applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the administrative proceedings against them had been unfair.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0405JUD000368407
5 avril 2012
The case originated in an application (no. 3684/07) against the Kingdom of Sweden lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC003403611
22 mai 2012
On 2 November 2011 the Government submitted a friendly settlement declaration in which they stated inter alia: “...Taking into account the ruling of the Court in M.S.S. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016DEC005099010
16 octobre 2012
On 7 October 2011 the Government submitted a friendly settlement declaration in which they stated, inter alia,: “...Taking into account the ruling of the Court in M.S.S. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC003293610
On 7 October 2011 the Government submitted a friendly settlement declaration in which they stated, inter alia: “...Taking into account the ruling of the Court in M.S.S. v.
civ2
61372329cd580146774063f4
15 avril 1999
de l'article 1384, alinéa 1er, du Code civil, après avoir écarté l'application de l'alinéa 2 du même texte, et de les avoir condamnés in solidum avec la Maif au paiement d'une somme à la Samda, alors,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1108DEC004082515
8 novembre 2022
In December 2009 this Act was amended and in 2012 a new Civil Procedure Act entered into force, thus repealing and replacing it.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49239
30 avril 1981
been brought before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention; Whereas in his application introduced on 16 January 1975 the applicant complained
ECLI:CEDH:001-49254
25 janvier 1985
Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the convention; Whereas in their applications introduced between 25 May 1975 and 5 November 1980 the applicants complained principally
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000674308
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained, inter alia , under Article 3 of the Convention about the conditions of his detention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC002709804
In addition, he invoked Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. THE LAW 1.
cr
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2019:CR01158
25 juin 2019
du 12 mai 1987 et qu'en considération des variations de débit introduites dans sa demande de renouvellement de sa concession, un arrêté inter-préfectoral portant règlement d'eau de la retenue de la Gimone