The parties had separated in 2008 and the applicant’s husband had moved out; in the same year he had started a new relationship with a woman.

However, it appeared that the first had died in the course of the proceedings. The latter responded to the court’s email that he did not know the applicant and refused to testify.

The applicant company further complained that the email correspondence of the individuals concerned had been checked without their consent.

Bastien Lignereux, maître des requêtes ; - les conclusions de Mme Emilie Bokdam-Tognetti, rapporteure publique ; La parole ayant été donnée, après les conclusions, à Maître Haas, avocat de M.

In 2011, the land had been privatised and sold to a private company-investor.

  11208/02) out of the Court’s list of cases, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Emil Strucki, is a Polish national who was born in 1932 and lives in Koszalin.

that he had no criminal record, that he had voluntarily given himself up to the police, as well as his state of health and other personal circumstances.

A subsequent inquiry by one of the bar associations, however, concluded that the barrister had committed no disciplinary offence and had not acted contrary to professional ethics.

22 Avril 2024 Contradictoire en premier ressort Mise à disposition de la décision par Madame Valérie OURSEL-ZUBER, Juge Aux Affaires Familiales, Juge aux affaires familiales, assisté e de Madame Emilie

It held, in particular, that the District Court had examined all the circumstances of the case and the parties’ submissions, had studied the evidence, and had given an assessment of it.

10.07.1995 Ümmü Yüksel, Emine Yüksel, Eşe Yüksel (Söylemez), Fahriye Yüksel (Önder), Hacer Yüksel (Saklar), Fatma Yüksel (Bor), Rahime Yüksel (Kara), Murat Yüksel, Fazilet Yüksel (Güven), Hürüye Yüksel

It held that the applicant had not been deprived of his liberty, as there had been no “arrest” or “detention”; he had left the police station after having been merely “warned” about the “unlawful parking

In his email the applicant indicated the exact http link to the forum where the offensive comments of A.J. had been posted.

Two of the impugned comments had not been picked up by the moderators, but thirteen minutes after having notified them of concerns, the applicant’s counsel received an email stating that the comments had

  601 had been reclassified from forest to Treasury property under Section   2(B) of Law no. 6831 .

    In those emails, the applicant also made statements regarding Mr   J.S., such as the following: he lacked “knowledge of basic laws”; he had committed a serious “breach of the obedience

A B de Lagarde, maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, - les conclusions de Mme Emilie Bokdam-Tognetti, rapporteure publique ; La parole ayant été donnée, après les conclusions, à Me Haas, avocat

that they had not seen anything, and the soldiers on duty had categorically denied that he had been arrested and taken into custody.

The Justices had suffered losses related to the collapse of the banks, Milestone had been vilified in the media for causing such losses and the general sentiment in society towards the applicant had been

She later discovered that the email in question had been sent from her own email address after her account had been hacked.