Principaux faits   Le requérant, Dorjel Lupsa, est un ressortissant serbe âgé de 40 ans qui réside actuellement à Belgrade.

On 22 July 2010 the Belgrade Commercial Court opened insolvency proceedings in respect of the debtor. The applicant did not report her claims in the insolvency proceedings.

On 13 October 2015 the Third Basic Court in Belgrade gave full custody of the children to the applicant as a provisional measure and ordered their return to her.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

non-pecuniary damage per applicant (in euros) [1] 2 Amount awarded for costs and expenses per application (in euros) 3     37733/18 23/07/2018 Daniela TRIVANOVIĆ 1982   Popara Aleksandar Belgrade

’s name Year of birth   Relevant domestic decision Start date of non-enforcement period End date of non-enforcement period   57223/22 07/12/2022 Velimir JANKOVIĆ 1960 Commercial Court in Belgrade

Applicant’s name Year of birth   Relevant domestic decision Start date of non-enforcement period End date of non-enforcement period   49714/22 13/10/2022 Milan ZARIĆ 1968 Commercial Court in Belgrade

Kojić, a lawyer practicing in Belgrade. 2.     The Serbian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms Z. Jadrijević Mladar. 3.

    On 2 November 2012 the Belgrade Court of Appeal reversed the judgment of 9 April 2010, and rejected the applicant’s case. 10.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Dorić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Kojić, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zečević, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

Zeković, a lawyer practising in Belgrade. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

attaqué, statuant sur renvoi après cassation (1re Civ. 10 juillet 2013, pourvoi n° 11-28.124), et les productions, que le divorce de Petar X... et Mme Y..., qui s'étaient mariés le 22 décembre 1977 à Belgrade

se rapporte à un relevé de consommation d'électricité qui fait ressortir sans qu'il soit nécessaire de traduire le document la consommation d'électricité au domicile déclaré par l'appelant situé à Belgrade

BELKAÏD La République mande et ordonne au préfet du Gard en ce qui le concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées, de