By letters of 28 June 2024, sent via registered mail both to the first applicant and his lawyer, the Court warned the first applicant that his case could be struck out of the list.

On 19 September 2014 the Court sent a letter to the applicant’s lawyer informing him about the communication of the case to the Government.

On 21 September 2006 the Beyoğlu Criminal Court also issued a decision of lack of jurisdiction and sent the case-file to the Court of Cassation.

THE LAW By letter dated 2 October 2008 the Government’s observations were sent to the applicant, who was requested to submit any observations together with any claims for just satisfaction in reply by

After notice of the application was given to the Government, by a letter dated 29 September 2009 and sent by registered post, their observations were transmitted to the applicant, who was requested to

By letter dated 12 October 2011, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 2 June 2011 and that no extension of time

On 18 December 2009 the Registry sent to the representative, by registered post, a copy of its letter of 15 April 2009.

By letter dated 5 August 2024, sent by registered post to the address indicated by the applicant in August 2022 as the one where he wanted any correspondence from the Court addressed to him to be sent

By letters sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), the applicants were notified that the period allowed for submission of their observations   had expired on 14 November

By letter dated 16 April 2003, the Government’s observations were sent to the applicants’ solicitor, who was requested to submit any observations in reply by   2 June 2003.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 27 mars 2025, Mme B A, actuellement maintenue en zone d'attente de Lyon Saint-Exupéry et représentée par Me Sene, demande au tribunal : 1°

By letter dated 13 July 2007, sent by registered post, the applicant was notified that the period allowed for submission of his observations had expired on 30 May 2007 and that no extension of time had

By letter dated 2 August 2007, sent by registered post, the applicant’s representative was notified that the period allowed for submission of the applicant’s observations had expired on 22 May 2007 and

The proceedings were based on the fact that J. had opened the letter sent by the insurance company.

The Supreme Court Senate upheld the judgment of the Civil Division.

En définitive, son pourvoi en cassation, introduit devant le sénat de la Cour suprême par le procureur et examiné en audience publique le 6 octobre 1999, fut rejeté.

Sénat, 27 juin 1996, p.4249) ; que Monsieur de PERETTI, Ministre délégué à l'Outre-mer, a déclaré le même jour : « un décret du 30 juin 1955 a mis en place une procédure de vérification permettant aux

aires de stationnement ; qu'il ressort des pièces du dossier qu'en raison notamment de la situation des zones concernées au sein d'un ensemble naturel de grande valeur, notamment de celle du Mas de Serret

Lamy, rapporteur public, - et les observations de Me Aymard de la Ferté-Sénectère, représentant M. A.

. - Les actes du congrès, de sa commission permanente et de son président, du sénat coutumier et de son président, de l'assemblée de province, de son bureau et de son président mentionnés au II sont exécutoires