Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139685
25 novembre 2013
25 novembre 2013
The remaining family in Pakistan could help her. Medical care was available in Pakistan.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2055663-2181427
5 juillet 2007
5 juillet 2007
Accordingly, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 2.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1636723-1714833
11 avril 2006
11 avril 2006
A hearing was held in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 26 April 2005.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2048141-2166600
28 juin 2007
28 juin 2007
During his detention on remand, Mr Malechkov was held at the Pazardzhik Regional Investigation Service from 3 July to 10 November 1998 and then Pazardzhik Prison until 11 January 2001.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-585277-588924
9 juillet 2002
9 juillet 2002
Consequently, the Court unanimously held that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1497158-1566075
8 novembre 2005
8 novembre 2005
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1551271-1623624
10 janvier 2006
10 janvier 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been: a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights; a violation of Article 13 (right
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68234-68702
11 juillet 2000
11 juillet 2000
Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3 (right to be brought promptly before a judge) of the European Convention on Human Rights and
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1879196-1977405
19 décembre 2006
19 décembre 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture) of the European Convention on Human Rights on account of the torture to which the applicants
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0429JUD000234602
29 avril 2002
29 avril 2002
But her physical incapacity is now such that she can no longer, without help, take her own life. With the support of her family, she wishes to enlist the help of her husband to that end.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1809473-1898217
12 octobre 2006
12 octobre 2006
Accordingly, the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a breach of Article 6 § 1 and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1660104-1744992
4 mai 2006
4 mai 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10.
Source officielleChambre commerciale
62849050498a54057d102e56
17 mai 2022
17 mai 2022
déférée à la Cour : Jugement du 23 SEPTEMBRE 2019 TRIBUNAL DE COMMERCE DE MONTPELLIER N° RG 16/13201 APPELANT : Maître [G] [W] agissant en qualité de liquidateur judiciaire de la SARL HELIOS
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2013:C100107
13 février 2013
13 février 2013
Y..., de nationalité américaine, est issu un enfant Hélio Juba Y..., né le 4 avril 2008 à Bozeman, dans l'Etat du Montana (Etats-Unis) ; que, le 1er avril 2011, Mme X... a quitté le territoire américain
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253ca78bd3db21cbdd8b1ed
11 décembre 2007
11 décembre 2007
Le jugement sera infirmé en ce qu' il a débouté Richard X... et le Centre Hélio- Marin.
Source officielleciv1
613720c7cd580146773ee501
10 mai 1989
10 mai 1989
(Pyrénées-Atlantiques), en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 10 juin 1987 par la cour d'appel d'Agen (1re chambre), au profit de : 1°/ La société MAISON D'ENFANTS HELIOS, société à responsabilité limitée
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1737892-1822253
27 juillet 2006
27 juillet 2006
In August 2000 she was informed that her son was not being held in any prison in Russia.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-456248-457080
6 décembre 2001
6 décembre 2001
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, both concerning the right of access to a court and
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1406761-1474912
2 août 2005
2 août 2005
The Court observed that Ms Özdemir had been held in pre-trial detention for approximately seven years and seven months.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1454738-1530062
27 septembre 2005
27 septembre 2005
In those circumstances, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10.
Source officiellePage 76 sur 2440