in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

In the course of the pre-trial detention the applicant’s health deteriorated further.

Judgment 23.11.2021 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-1 Lawful arrest or detention Procedure prescribed by law Pre-trial detention of judges suspected of membership of an illegal organisation following

  1343 of 26/12/2007, which limits the duration of pre-trial detention.

    The trial was held in camera from 12 December 2005 to 8   February 2006. 6.

DESSAISISSEMENT N° RG 25/03004 - N° Portalis DBV3-V-B7J-XF55 Audience dans le cadre de la mise en état de la Ch civ. 1-4 construction de la cour d'appel de Versailles du 07 Avril 2026 Nous, Fabienne TROUILLER

It remitted the case to the trial court for re-examination. 5.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial two police officers on whose written statements her conviction was based.

In March 2012 Judge F. of the District Court took a decision setting the criminal case down for trial.

They rely in particular on Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial) and Article 10 (freedom of expression).   K.Ö. v.

had legal representation at the trial. 28.

    The course of the investigation and the trial 6.

On the latter date, his pre-trial detention was ordered again and it lasted until 24 November 2010, when the applicant was again placed in house arrest. He was released on 6   June 2014.

The applicant appealed against this decision in so far as it concerned the lifting of his pre-trial detention.

On 14 December 2016, the applicant was questioned by the investigating judge and remanded in pre-trial detention.

CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of his alleged inability to examine key witness V.M. and his conviction based on the pre-trial

QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES Did the applicant’s pre-trial detention comply with the requirements of Article   5 §   3 of the Convention?