In the Court’s view, this amounted to a restriction of the applicant’s right of effective access to court; such restrictions were permissible under Article   6 of the Convention provided they pursued

These considerations led the courts to assume that the applicant, if released, could obstruct the proper course of the proceedings.

Court cannot fail to take into account a statement by the Cypriot Supreme Court, whatever its status in domestic law, that the provisions of the Criminal Code violated neither the Convention nor the Constitution

Italy - 14399/88 Judgment 24.8.1993 Article 6 Article 6-1 Civil rights and obligations Reasonable time Length of proceedings in the Court of Audit: violation [This summary is extracted from the Court’s

District Court of Krasnoyarsk No information Reasons Risks : absconding;     interfering with the course of justice;     re-offending.

and in the High Court.

The applicant had been warned that those counts of coercion could be taken into account at the sentencing stage for the remaining four counts. The Regional Court did so in its sentencing procedure.

conseil relative au caractère communicable des documents suivants à des administrés qu'une procédure judiciaire oppose actuellement à Monsieur X, gérant de la station de lavage automobile « X » : 1) le courrier

In the course of the proceedings to enforce the Court’s decision, they were informed that on 28 April 2014 the applicant company merged with another company and the later took over all the applicant company

On 5   December 2016 the Primorskiy Regional Court found the applicant guilty of three counts of fraud and participation in criminal activities of an organised group and gave him a three years’ conditional

Furthermore, the court pointed to a serious risk of obstructing the course of the proceedings, as the applicant had been involved in the activities of an organised criminal group.

On 11   September 2008 the Baku Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal lodged by the applicants against the Narimanov District Court’s judgment of 4   April 2008. 13.

Access to court)

6-1 - Access to court)

of 1 December 2003 by the Shakhtinskiy Town Court of the Rostov Region against a private party. 9.

6-1 - Access to court)

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, extended composition) of 9 January 1996.#Casper Koelman v Commission of the European Communities.

    On various dates the applicants’ requests under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court were granted.

On 26 January 2009 the Zagreb State Attorney’s Office indicted the applicant before the Zagreb Municipal Criminal Court ( Općinski kazneni sud u Zagrebu ) on: (a) three counts of the criminal offence of

He pointed out that there had been no hearing before the Regional Court and that it was only from the Regional Court’s decision that he had learned of the Constitutional Court’s decisions underlying it