CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-97133
3 décembre 2009
font-size:8pt } .s846B54EF { font-size:5.33pt; vertical-align:super; color:#0069d6 } Resolution CM/ResDH(2009)145 [1] Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights Paul and Audrey Edwards
Page 8 sur 32
Pôle 4 - Chambre 3
6960ede0cdc6046d47bd0e0d
8 janvier 2026
Cour, composée de : - Madame Anne-Laure MEANO, présidente de la chambre ; - Mme Aurore DOCQUINCOURT, Conseillère ; - Madame Laura TARDY, Conseillère ; Greffier, lors des débats : Monsieur Edouard
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304DEC002823102
4 mars 2003
Prosecuting counsel made it clear to the judge that he did not know whether the applicant had told his own solicitors or counsel that he was an informant.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2059028-2179320
11 juillet 2007
On 3 November 2006 the applicant was released, as fresh information made it clear that it would not be possible to deport him to France.
soc
61372433cd5801467741379f
7 avril 2004
Edgard Pepineau, demeurant 78, rue Vaufoynard, 37210 Rochecorbon, 32 / de M. Jean-Michel Pinon, demeurant 2, rue du Bas Village, 37600 Loches, 33 / de M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC000449102
21 janvier 2003
The Court notes that as a general rule, it is for the national courts to assess the evidence before them (see the Edwards judgment cited above, § 34).
Pôle 5 - Chambre 10
64f6c4f0ed0253d969201d10
4 septembre 2023
CMA-CGM janvier 2023 - 500 000 euros sur le produit structuré CLN CMA-CGM Le 10 avril 2018, la société Parfin a investi à nouveau une somme de 100 000 euros sur un produit structuré CLN Rallye juin
Chambre civile
63dcb52bfea95005de85f19d
24 janvier 2023
CLUNY KEBAB, prise en la personne de son gérant en exercice [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Charles-Edouard FENOT, avocat au barreau de MARTINIQUE INTIMEE : S.C.I.
1re chambre 1re section
5fd97fcc58fe926e91f36fc1
21 janvier 2020
[C] [Y] clos au 31 août 2010.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC006059000
It is far from clear that this document was served on the defence.
4ème chambre jugeant seule
ECLI:FR:CECHS:2021:448993.20211001
1 octobre 2021
Edouard Solier, maître des requêtes, - les conclusions de M. Raphaël Chambon, rapporteur public ; Considérant ce qui suit : 1.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305DEC005788417
5 mars 2019
As to how Article 5 § 1 (c) should be interpreted, it conducted an extensive review of this Court’s case-law and considered that it was not clear and settled on this point.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111JUD000668405
11 janvier 2011
29777/96, ECHR 2000 ‑ II; Edwards and Lewis v. the United Kingdom , nos. 39647/98 and 40461/98, 22 July 2003 and Dowsett v. the United Kingdom , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0326JUD000761409
26 mars 2015
Moreover, it is clear from these documents and the respective judgments that these complaints were understood by the domestic courts as such, but were dismissed.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2417428-2613077
8 juillet 2008
Demonstrators protesting that the elections had been rigged and calling for the resignation of Georgian President Eduard Shevardnadze disrupted the newly-elected Parliament’s first session on 22
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217DEC007258912
17 décembre 2020
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the inadequate conditions of detention (see, for example, Ananyev and Others v.
62833c405a52a8057d9918cd
16 mai 2022
Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la Cour, composée de : Monsieur Edouard LOOS, Président Madame Sylvie CASTERMANS, Conseillère Monsieur Stanislas de CHERGÉ, Conseiller
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC002020107
3 mai 2011
Un agresseur aurait dû disposer d’une clef pour accéder à la cellule ; puis, au moment de ressortir, perdre un temps précieux à installer la table et l’attacher en laissant forcément la porte de
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1016DEC002770195
16 octobre 1996
Consequently, it became clear that under the domestic law the applicant trade union cannot claim this entitlement before the courts.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196463
12 septembre 2019
1pt; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt 0.9pt } .sE933ECD6 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:6pt; text-align:justify; font-size:8pt } Communicated on 12 September 2019 THIRD SECTION Application no. 17161/11 Eduard