Did the applicants have at their disposal an effective domestic remedy for their complaint under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, as required by Article   13 of the Convention?

Par requête en rectification d'erreur matérielle parvenue au greffe via le RPVA le 26 mars 2026, la société DIAC S.A. sollicite la rectification du dispositif de l'arrêt.

S’agissant des requérantes M mes Maria de Lurdes Paiva de Almeida Menezes et Maria da Conceição F.

   Rosa Maria Aires de Jesus, née en 1958 et résidant à Almada   3.    Maria Cristina Dias Coelho, née en 1948 et résidant à Almada   4.

Greffier lors des débats : Mme Maria FREDON. Les parties ont été avisées que le prononcé de la décision aurait lieu par mise à disposition au greffe le 06 Juillet 2022.

They did not however submit any documents to support this claim, nor did they indicate the date of the judicial decision or the court adopting it.

It appears that the court did not hear the parties and the applicant did not have an opportunity to make any submissions.

In that connection, did the applicant’s detention in that unit constitute solitary confinement in the form of total or relative social isolation (see Ramirez Sanchez v.

(i)      Maria LITVINA She requested a dental examination which did not take place.

However, the Supreme Court did not consider the applicants’ reply to the appeal on points of law.

Did it pursue a “legitimate aim” within the meaning of Article 10 §   2 of the Convention?

Maria GRAVALA 1963 Greek Thessaloniki 18. Maria GEORGOPOULOU 1959 Greek Krestena Ilias 19. Chrysanou VERGIDOU 1956 Greek Thessaloniki 20. Georgios VARIS 1975 Greek Thessaloniki 21.

Maria ATHANASOPOULOU 1948 Greek Patra 2. Vasiliki TSAMI 1952 Greek Patra 3. Christina SOTIROPOULOU 1970 Greek Zarouchleika Patron 4. Maria DALAPA 1967 Greek Patra 5.

Vu le jugement contradictoire rendu le 19 octobre 2020 par le tribunal de commerce de Paris, devenu le tribunal des activités économique, qui a : - dit non recevable l'action de la société Loc Maria

She was first taken to the public health centre of Arouca and subsequently transferred to Santa Maria da Feira Hospital. 4.

They supported their arguments by reference, inter alia, to the findings of the majority of the Supreme Court in the case of Maria Koutselini-Ioannidou v.

Did they give relevant and sufficient reasons for their judgments?   2.

font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .s451A1BF5 { margin-top:6pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-indent:14.2pt }   Communicated on 20 September 2018   FIRST SECTION Application no. 74272/17 Marica

In particular, did the deprivation of property impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants on account of the amount awarded to them as expropriation compensation (see Preite v.

On 15 May 2023 and on 7   April   2025 the Santa Maria Capua Vetere Supervisory Judge ordered the prison medical service to ensure that the applicant be provided with such medical treatment.