CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.5M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Pascal Hays »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

TJ

2ème Chambre civile

69d80e98cdc6046d47b0aaa9

T. Judiciaire

9 avril 2026

9 avril 2026

17 a 5 ca ; - déclarer que ladite décision a rendu la vente parfaite au profit de la SAFER PACA ; - déclarer que le jugement à intervenir vaudra titre de propriété pour la SAFER PACA sur les parcelles

Page 8 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205DEC000424614

Admin. suprême

5 février 2019

5 février 2019

He submitted that all his family ties had ceased to exist. He maintained exchange of correspondence only with some friends, and on rare occasions receives parcels. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0404DEC000610706

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2023

4 avril 2023

to parcels 239 and 410) had been irreversibly altered following the completion of the public works.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 6 - Chambre 12

6360ca863c369c7f74996fef

Appel

28 octobre 2022

28 octobre 2022

Pascal PEDRON, Président de chambre, chargé du rapport. Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries dans le délibéré de la cour, composée de : M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002850295

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

; that no building permit had been granted regarding the house; that an enforcement notice requiring the demolition of the house had been issued and that the file had been transferred to the Salzburg Regional

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0413DEC001273287

Admin. suprême

13 avril 1989

13 avril 1989

Hamer, a lawyer, practising in Amsterdam.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002636795

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

The City Court found that, under the Act on Private Roads, G, as the owner of the parcel, had had the right temporarily to use the six-metre-wide road over which T's original property had a right of way

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC000712304

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

name and the latter had been notified of this.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0710DEC001179685

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1989

10 juillet 1989

  It observed that by the provisional transfer of lands the applicants had received compensation parcels according to their own wishes whose designation as agricultural land had not been changed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1207JUD003761602

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2010

7 décembre 2010

    Consequently, there has been a violation of Article   1 of Protocol   No.   1 in relation to parcels nos. 193, 157, 195, 150, 171 and 203. II.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1125JUD001288487

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 1994

25 novembre 1994

  In decisions (Bescheide) taken on 27 May (parcel 725/7), 8 July (parcel 725/6), 3 September (parcel 725/5), 14 October (parcel 725/4) and 22 October 1982 (parcel 725/3) the Land Government dismissed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:0716DEC000344467

Admin. suprême

16 juillet 1970

16 juillet 1970

As the documents were marked with the name of the Ministry of Industry, it was presumed that they had accidently fallen out of a parcel sent to or by the Ministry.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002281193

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

In so far as the applicants had alleged to have paid an important price for their former parcel AK 8 and that this parcel was also future construction land, the court noted that the price allegation had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0423JUD000961681

Admin. suprême

23 avril 1987

23 avril 1987

  The compensatory parcels of land to be allotted to the landowners concerned had been marked out.   Mr. and Mrs.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0122JUD003818597

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2004

22 janvier 2004

It found that it had not been in dispute between the parties that the parcels of land at issue were subject to Ordinance No   1990/40.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2231342-2392559

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2008

17 janvier 2008

She alleged that the annulment of a final judgment in which she had been granted salary entitlements had breached the principle of legal certainty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188113

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2018

8 novembre 2018

In particular, did he have a legitimate expectation as regards his claim concerning the property that he had been using for an extended period of time?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208DEC002926895

Admin. suprême

8 février 2000

8 février 2000

Because of the refusal of her request for a partition of her land, she had not been able to sell or auction the separate parcels.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

6137227acd580146773fd7c1

Cassation

8 juin 1995

8 juin 1995

29 a 26 ca et celui de Victor Z... une contenance de 1 Ha 88 a 25 ca, a, à tort, fixé la ligne divisoire selon un tracé HDEF qui réduit la parcelle de Gérard Y... à une contenance de 1 ha 13 a 40 ca et

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0425DEC002046204

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2017

25 avril 2017

According to a report by an agricultural expert, the disputed parcels were farmland that had not been cultivated for fifteen or twenty years and were covered with wild plants. 12.

Source officielle