of his personal integrity. 56.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

[The applicant] showed his “Lukoil-City” company work pass, and [his brother] showed his military ID card.

proceedings on his appeal against his detention had not been speedy. 22.

the accused has already given an address in his presence.

For instance, if his name is unknown but his personal identity number appears, his name and address can be found by virtue of electronic data processing.

his term of office. 15.

Moreover, the applicant, despite not having obtained any ruling on his first application after his acquittal had become final, continued to pursue his case and lodged a second application.

    The applicant complains under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention about the length of the proceedings, which was so unreasonable as to render his trial unfair.   2.

mars 2019 par lequel la préfète de la Charente a délivré à la société Energie Charente une autorisation unique pour l'implantation et l'exploitation d'un parc éolien sur le territoire de la commune d'Hiesse

sur la détention de X..., selon lequel les garanties de représentation par lui offertes étaient par elles-mêmes insuffisantes et d'exposer ce qui, selon elle, pouvait rendre désormais suffisant ce qu'elle

d'asile ORDONNANCE DU 18 JUILLET 2024 (1 pages) Numéro d'inscription au répertoire général et de décision : B N° RG 24/03251 - N° Portalis 35L7-V-B7I-CJXN6 Décision déférée : ordonnance rendue

Elle devait prendre un traitement qu’elle a arrêtée parce qu’elle n’avait plus d’ordonnance et qu’elle n’avait pas pu se rendre à son rendez-vous au CMP pour la faire renouveler.

Je précise être handicapé et ce à hauteur de 10 %. » Entendu le même jour le salarié répondait : « Hier, le camion d'approvisionnement d'essence pour les engins est venu sur place et je m'y suis rendu

life during his detention. 17.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

As his maternal filiation had been recognised in 1983, the applicant had an interest, enforceable in the domestic courts, in asserting his right to receive a share of his mother’s estate in a manner compatible

His request was refused as ill-founded. 15.

initiated against him and his company at the time of his arrest.

It also considered untenable the applicant’s alibi, holding that his hospitalisation had not prevented him from being present when N.M. had left for Switzerland on 14 April 2015, and that his assertion