Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
cr
61372585cd5801467741e786
8 novembre 1993
8 novembre 1993
Guilloux, Fabre, Mme Baillot conseillers de la chambre, M.
Source officiellecr
61372588cd5801467741e8cc
2 septembre 1992
2 septembre 1992
Milleville, Guilloux, Alphand conseillers de la chambre, M. Echappé conseiller référendaire, M. Monestié avocat général, Mme Gautier greffier de chambre ;
Source officiellecr
61372593cd5801467741eee3
17 mars 1993
17 mars 1993
Guilloux, Massé, Fabre conseillers de la chambre, MM. Nivôse, Echappé conseillers référendaires, M.
Source officiellecr
6137253ccd5801467741c19f
13 février 1991
13 février 1991
Diémer, Guth, Guilloux, Massé conseillers de la chambre, MM. Pelletier, Nivôse conseillers référendaires, M. Perfetti avocat général, Mme Gautier greffier de chambre ;
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Caen
ORTA_2101299_20221020
20 octobre 2022
20 octobre 2022
GUILLOU N° 1802461
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Caen
ORTA_2200626_20220909
9 septembre 2022
9 septembre 2022
GUILLOU La République mande et ordonne préfet du Calvados en ce qui le concerne et à tous les commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun, contre les parties privées
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Caen
ORTA_2200681_20220728
28 juillet 2022
28 juillet 2022
GUILLOU La République mande et ordonne au préfet de l'Orne en ce qui le concerne, ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1800
16 décembre 2008
16 décembre 2008
Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Disciplinary penalty imposed on doctor for criticising fellow practitioner in report to a patient: violation Facts : The applicant, a consultant, was found guilty
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-142478
17 mars 2014
17 mars 2014
On 31 May 2007 the applicant was found guilty as charged and sentenced to ten months’ imprisonment, suspended for three years, but this judgment was quashed on appeal on 29 January 2008.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-139123
14 novembre 2013
14 novembre 2013
Minor-Offences proceedings On 4 June 2007 the Labin Minor-Offences Court found the applicant guilty of physically attacking a football judge, one I.R., during a football match in Viškovići
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126964
12 septembre 2013
12 septembre 2013
On 18 August 2009 the Erzurum Assize Court with special jurisdiction found the applicant guilty of making terrorist propaganda on behalf of an illegal organisation and sentenced him to four terms
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189297
10 décembre 2018
10 décembre 2018
He had not pleaded guilty and he had been part of a criminal enterprise. The applicant filed an appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-178614
19 octobre 2017
19 octobre 2017
6 of Pervouralsk found the applicant guilty of having made a death threat to A. and having caused bodily injuries to A. The court gave the applicant a 2.5 years’ suspended sentence.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157681
8 septembre 2015
8 septembre 2015
On 29 February 2012 the Buzet Police Station ( Policijska uprava istarska, Policijska postaja Buzet ) issued a penalty notice, having found the applicant guilty of several minor road traffic offences.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152945
16 février 2015
16 février 2015
On 23 November 2005 the Zagreb Minor Offences Court ( Prekršajni sud u Zagrebu ) found the applicant guilty on charges of minor offence of family violence for having verbally abused and assaulted his wife
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-206806
25 novembre 2020
25 novembre 2020
On 27 June 2012 the Shevchenkivskyy District Court of Lviv found I.V. guilty of inflicting minor bodily injuries on the applicant in respect of one episode of 14 January 2010, sentenced him to one hundred
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189561
18 décembre 2018
18 décembre 2018
alleged violation of the applicant’s right to a fair trial (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention), to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention) and to respect
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1035
23 mars 2010
23 mars 2010
Relying in particular on a record drawn up on the basis of the two witness statements in question, the National Security Court found the applicant guilty of secessionist acts, considered it established
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-218713
6 juillet 2022
6 juillet 2022
In the criminal proceedings the applicant was found guilty of causing a road traffic accident in which one person had lost her life.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0908DEC006549616
8 septembre 2022
8 septembre 2022
The application concerned an alleged violation of the applicant’s rights to a fair trial (Article 6 § 1 of the Convention), to be presumed innocent until proved guilty (Article 6 § 2 of the Convention
Source officiellePage 86 sur 1307