Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC004430707
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227787
5 septembre 2023
5 septembre 2023
a serious or especially serious criminal offence) and 148 (insult) of the Criminal Code and sentenced him to one year and six months’ corrective work with deduction of 15% of his monthly income in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC004066307
22 juin 2010
22 juin 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC004176307
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of a judgment in her favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226258
11 juillet 2023
11 juillet 2023
Has there been a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the applicant’s continued inability to have a final judgment fully enforced in her favour?
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-210449
17 mai 2021
17 mai 2021
Relying on Article 14 of the Convention, he also complains of discrimination in favour of imprisoned mothers who could keep their children with them, unlike imprisoned fathers.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233139
18 mars 2024
18 mars 2024
The Tbilisi City Court ruled in the applicant’s favour ordering Father I. to publicly retract his statement and to pay the applicant a symbolic amount of 1 Georgian lari in respect of non-pecuniary damage
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0619DEC004293823
19 juin 2025
19 juin 2025
The applicant’s complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and/or Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 thereto, about the non-enforcement of a final judgment in her favour were communicated to the Government
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225011
5 mai 2023
5 mai 2023
However, the Court of Appeal reversed the first instance court’s judgment, ruling in favour of the pension authority.
Source officielle1ère Chambre
69e858e8cdc6046d4718ce3e
21 avril 2026
21 avril 2026
légal en exercice domicilié en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 2] Représentants : Maître Sophie CREPIN de la SELARL LX PAU-TOULOUSE, avocat au barreau de PAU, avocat postulant, Maître Laurent FAVET
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-193419
29 avril 2019
29 avril 2019
The applicant complained to the administrative courts that the decision to recount the ballots had been arbitrary and that many ballots in his favour had been spoilt while already in the ConEC.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC000383108
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1, 13 and 17 of the Convention about non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-250097
13 avril 2026
13 avril 2026
By a final decision of 1 April 2020, the Supreme Court overturned the rulings of the lower courts given in the applicant’s favour and dismissed his claim.
Source officiellecr
USE, en date du 25 mai 1988, disant n'y avoir lieu à informerc/Denis Y
61372538cd5801467741bf8d
13 février 1989
13 février 1989
la commune de Mauvezin-Sainte-Croix, pour dénonciation calomnieuse en lui reprochant d'avoir adressé à la gendarmerie la copie d'une lettre par laquelle il lui enjoignait d'enlever des grumes et des fagots
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224650
11 avril 2023
11 avril 2023
If so, did the partial refusal to make such an award in the applicant’s favour amount to an interference with the right guaranteed under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention and was it subject
Source officielleMagistrat statuant seul
DTA_2401355_20251024
24 octobre 2025
24 octobre 2025
payer une amende de 1 500 euros pour contravention de grande voirie et à remettre sans délai dans leur état initial les lieux occupés sans autorisation sur le domaine public maritime de la plage de Favone
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Grenoble
ORTA_2206020_20231114
14 novembre 2023
14 novembre 2023
Par un mémoire enregistré le 19 octobre 2023, la MAAF représentée par Me Favet demande au juge des référés sa mise hors de cause.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC004274705
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
The applicant complained under Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about non-enforcement of a court judgment in his favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316DEC005635907
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
The applicant complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention about non-enforcement of a judgment in her favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4872
20 mai 2003
20 mai 2003
The council then appealed to the Administrative Court of Appeal, which ruled in its favour. The applicant lodged an appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court in December 1994.
Source officiellePage 92 sur 606