the bank as a result of misuse and abuse of its resources. 20.

    As a result of the declaration of incompatibility in Westminster City Council v.

    The applicants were co-founders of and shareholders in a private media company (“the media company”) which owned the television channel “TV   202” (“the channel”), broadcasting in Tbilisi

On the same day a Rustavi   2 television channel presenter quoted Mr   Z.Z. as follows: “Madneuli will not be left in dirty hands again.

    The applicant company is a limited liability company and is the owner of the Greek television channel ALPHA. 6.

At around 10:55 on 14 January 2000 a police officer on duty transmitted over a communication channel that two persons had highjacked a car.

    The applicant did not make any submissions in this request. 13.

The case was referred to the Grand Chamber at the request of the Government. A Grand Chamber hearing took place in public in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 24 May 2006.

He also complains of a breach of Articles 6 and 8 of the Convention as a result of the alleged failure of the Italian courts to examine his requests of 16 January and 15 November 2007.

That provision had therefore been incompatible with the “lawfulness” requirement in Article 5   §   1.

    On 20 May 2008 the applicants submitted before the same court a request for legal aid ( ευεργέτημα πενίας ).

Request for the applicant’s pre-trial detention 16.

Par voie de conséquence, les conclusions de la requête à fin d'injonction doivent être rejetées. Sur l'application de l'article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative : 28.

and he had been given the result of the investigation. 18.

Par des mémoires enregistrés le 21 septembre 2023 et le 16 août 2024, ce dernier n'ayant pas été communiqué, la société Bati Terre, représentée par Me Gay, conclut au rejet de la requête, à titre subsidiaire

Sliti était toujours sous traitement médical   ; une ordonnance du Dr   Chabannes, datée du 21 mai 1999, en atteste.

[N] conclut au rejet de la demande de Mme [Y].

La Cour estime qu’il s’agit d’un nouveau grief, distinct de ceux contenus dans la requête initiale.